Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:32 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: KKF runnin good against Mahat (Low Cont)

[ QUOTE ]
And? If we are going to see stupid [censored] like the K5 vs QQ hand... We may as well see a hand you lost that could easily warrant much more discussion then that one.

[/ QUOTE ]

that was the first hand of a session, i didnt start the 15th thread of the day about KKF.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:33 PM
Yeti Yeti is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 30
Default Re: KKF runnin good against Mahat (Low Cont)

KKF, ignore the haters. I am gaining interest in this soap opera now. I would prefer to see you losing more, but I can wait.

More hands!!!!!!!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:41 PM
PassiveCaller PassiveCaller is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 7
Default Re: KKF runnin good against Mahat (Low Cont)

[ QUOTE ]
that was the first hand of a session, i didnt start the 15th thread of the day about KKF.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes yes, I'll agree we don't need 5000 KKF hand threads (albeit it is an interesting saga we probably dont even need a new daily thread), but in terms of value this one is just as valuable as any of the other hands posted and could easily leave some posters with real questions as opposed to some of the others.

That's all, Nothing personal.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-14-2005, 06:16 PM
KaneKungFu123 KaneKungFu123 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,026
Default Re: KKF runnin good against Mahat (Low Cont)

you guys should limit this crap to one thread, its really starting to clutter the forum.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-14-2005, 07:58 PM
SunOfBeach SunOfBeach is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 5
Default Questionable hand in KKF/Mahatma game?

I don't exactly play alot of 50-100NL... so is this not a virtual certainty to be AA at this level!?!?!?!

Hand #9173956-46740 at Fortenza (No Limit Hold'em)
Powered by UltimateBet
Started at 14/Nov/05 18:48:11

Far is at seat 0 with $32310.
ambi is at seat 1 with $10194.
Mahatma is at seat 2 with $12889.
teacuppoker is at seat 3 with $7730.50.
1D10T is at seat 4 with $10697.
33floor is at seat 5 with $5888.
All For Love is at seat 6 with $4800.
SABCT is at seat 7 with $2624.50.
Sagan is at seat 8 with $2954.
KaneKungFu123 is at seat 9 with $19145.
The button is at seat 4.

33floor posts the small blind of $50.
All For Love posts the big blind of $100.

Pre-flop:
SABCT calls. KaneKungFu123 folds. Far folds. ambi
raises to $450. Mahatma folds. teacuppoker folds.
1D10T folds. 33floor folds. All For Love folds.
SABCT re-raises to $800. ambi calls.

Flop (board: 4s 8c Jd):

SABCT bets $800. ambi raises to $2200. SABCT goes
all-in for $1824.50. ambi is returned $375.5(uncalled).

Showdown:

ambi shows Jh Ah.
ambi has Jh Ah 8c Jd Ts: a pair of jacks.
SABCT shows Ac As.
SABCT has Ac As 8c Jd Ts: a pair of aces.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-14-2005, 10:29 PM
dtbog dtbog is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 19
Default Re: Questionable hand in KKF/Mahatma game?

[ QUOTE ]
I don't exactly play alot of 50-100NL... so is this not a virtual certainty to be AA at this level!?!?!?!


[/ QUOTE ]

Haven't you read any of the other hands in these threads?

No, this is not certainly AA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.