Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Pot-, No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:51 AM
elus2 elus2 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 15
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

because he knows he'll be getting action from guys like you when you're holding AA/AK. even if he's holding a strong draw with equity of ~50% 2/3's of the time here but has you smashed the other 1/3 of the time you can muck top pair top kicker.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:05 AM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

In case anyone is interested, he is the equity breakdown from pokerstove:

Hand as posted:

990 games 0.005 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Kd Tc 6c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 61.6162 % 61.01% 00.61% { AcKh }
Hand 2: 38.3838 % 37.78% 00.61% { Kc5c }


---

When you dont have Ac:

990 games 0.005 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Kd Tc 6c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 55.4545 % 54.85% 00.61% { AsKh }
Hand 2: 44.5455 % 43.94% 00.61% { Kc5c }
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 07-06-2005, 04:17 AM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

[ QUOTE ]
In case anyone is interested, he is the equity breakdown from pokerstove:

Hand as posted:

990 games 0.005 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Kd Tc 6c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 61.6162 % 61.01% 00.61% { AcKh }
Hand 2: 38.3838 % 37.78% 00.61% { Kc5c }


---

When you dont have Ac:

990 games 0.005 secs 198,000 games/sec

Board: Kd Tc 6c
Dead:

equity (%) win (%) tie (%)
Hand 1: 55.4545 % 54.85% 00.61% { AsKh }
Hand 2: 44.5455 % 43.94% 00.61% { Kc5c }

[/ QUOTE ]



haha, that's not really the point though...of course i would like to have the Ac if i knew he had Kc5c. duh!! the point was that he is more likely to be semibluffing the nut flush draw if I don't have the Ac vs. if I do. If i have the Ac, now if i want to put him on a draw, i have to eliminate the most obvious one from my hand range (making sets/two pairs more prevelant).
My inquiry was the extent of the effect of those offsetting factors...
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:16 PM
vulturesrow vulturesrow is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

[ QUOTE ]

haha, that's not really the point though...of course i would like to have the Ac if i knew he had Kc5c. duh!! the point was that he is more likely to be semibluffing the nut flush draw if I don't have the Ac vs. if I do. If i have the Ac, now if i want to put him on a draw, i have to eliminate the most obvious one from my hand range (making sets/two pairs more prevelant).
My inquiry was the extent of the effect of those offsetting factors...

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup I know. But since there were some questions about equity I figured Id run a couple. But it was getting late and I didnt feel like doing any of the other scenarios [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Maybe later if anyone is interested.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:23 PM
amoeba amoeba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 691
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

this is interesting topic.

I wonder if the answer is different based on whether it came down

Kc Tc 6d

vs

Kd Tc 6c
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:35 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

More. Even if you don't have it, he's not pushing here with just the NFD. It would be a pair+FD or OESD+FD. His pair+FD hands are basically only AK which you aren't beating anyways. His OESD is QJs. If you didn't have the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] then he has 9 flush outs. When you have the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] he only has 8 flush outs and you have the nuts backdoor draw, so he needs three exactly, not four on the board. So I think you should be more likely to call with the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] since he is a)unlikely to call a raise with Axs and b)unlikely to push with just the NFD. And I don't think it's close. Not saying whether or not you should call, though, of course.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 07-06-2005, 02:42 PM
xorbie xorbie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,828
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

Why isn't he pushing with the nut flush draw? Especially on this board where he could have a gutshot to go with it (AQ/AJ). Against JQ[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] you already have one of his outs, it's not like the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] double counts and, again, you only have 6 outs anyway if he does hit the flush on the turn, so again you really only gain 2-3% equity.

I think pair + flush draw is really the only case where having the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] has, so I do think it's close.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:10 PM
TheWorstPlayer TheWorstPlayer is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Boring work = post too much
Posts: 2,435
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

I didn't remember that he was suspected of being LAG. He could have NFD.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 07-06-2005, 03:57 PM
SossMan SossMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 559
Default Re: a semi-theoretical question

[ QUOTE ]
More. Even if you don't have it, he's not pushing here with just the NFD. It would be a pair+FD or OESD+FD. His pair+FD hands are basically only AK which you aren't beating anyways. His OESD is QJs. If you didn't have the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] then he has 9 flush outs. When you have the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] he only has 8 flush outs and you have the nuts backdoor draw, so he needs three exactly, not four on the board. So I think you should be more likely to call with the A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] since he is a)unlikely to call a raise with Axs and b)unlikely to push with just the NFD. And I don't think it's close. Not saying whether or not you should call, though, of course.

[/ QUOTE ]

this player would definitely call a raise preflop w/ Axs
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:36 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.