#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: tricky one, well maybe not.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] He's a solid ring player but haven't seen him play SH too much [/ QUOTE ] DOES NOT COMPUTE [/ QUOTE ] Why not? Seemed pretty clear to me. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: tricky one, well maybe not.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He's a solid ring player but haven't seen him play SH too much [/ QUOTE ] DOES NOT COMPUTE [/ QUOTE ] Why not? Seemed pretty clear to me. [/ QUOTE ] if you're playing a shorthanded cash game you're still playing a ring game |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: tricky one, well maybe not.
I really want to see a showdown with this hand. If you think you have to bet/fold (which I'm not sure I'm doing), then I much rather choose check/call in this situation. Pot is big + Aces up + shorthanded = see showdown
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: tricky one, well maybe not.
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] He's a solid ring player but haven't seen him play SH too much [/ QUOTE ] DOES NOT COMPUTE [/ QUOTE ] Why not? Seemed pretty clear to me. [/ QUOTE ] if you're playing a shorthanded cash game you're still playing a ring game [/ QUOTE ] Sure, but someone can know that a player is a decent ring player based on full ring games played with them and not have much SH experience with them. I know hundreds of players I think are solid ring players that I have never played a SH ring game hand with in my life. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
RESULTS
I bet and he called.
Villian showed JT and MHIG. can't stop wondering if I should've checkraised this pot though. |
|
|