Which site has the "weakest" games? - Page 2

AngryCola · #11 03-25-2005, 02:12 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Agreed. Pacific players are god awful bad.

[/ QUOTE ]

I've played against much worse on some smaller sites.
Look for poker sites that feed off of sports betting.

droolie · #12 03-25-2005, 02:16 PM

party has the most fish

pacific has the highest concentration at all limits.

sublime · #13 03-25-2005, 02:26 PM

Post deleted by Mat Sklansky

WalkAmongUs · #14 03-25-2005, 02:53 PM

I play at a smaller site where I can easily make $20 an hour playing 2 tables of $2-4 holdem.

teddyFBI · #15 03-25-2005, 04:09 PM

[ QUOTE ]
pacific and bodog. bodog being better because its a site that actually functions [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

PM for refer a friend bonus kickbacks

[/ QUOTE ]

OK, you've got waaaaaaaay more posts than me here, so take my criticism with a grain of salt, but you should know better than I that you can't advertise any type of affiliate kickback here. Please remove it.

You've been doing an AWFUL lot of Bodog pimping of late...not quite sure why...personally i don't find the games there ALL that great; they're OK. Just please stop the pseudo-SPAM.

Wynton · #16 03-25-2005, 04:12 PM

I can't argue with those already mentioned, but would like to add that the players at Victory Poker are pretty damn horrible too.

splashpot · #17 03-25-2005, 04:21 PM

[ QUOTE ]
It depends on the limit. The generic answer to your question is that Party has the weakest $0.50 -$1.00 and $1-$2 Holdem games, so weak that on evenings and weekends it can get to be almost a crapshoot.

UB in my experience offers the most sane play at the lower limits such as $0.25-$0.50 and $0.50-$1.00, making it a good place to work on your game while keeping the tuition low. Of course there are some exceptions, depending on the time of day.

If you're looking for a different structure or limit, you could post again asking a more specific question, you'll probably get a better response.

[/ QUOTE ]

Wow, you must suck at poker.

NoTalent · #18 03-25-2005, 04:34 PM

Party is generally really good. Pacific sucks. Absolute is super tight and so is UB.

MajorCP · #19 03-25-2005, 04:53 PM

[ QUOTE ]
Wow, you must suck at poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just trying to give helpful advice, tailored to the person who asked for it.

What is it that you're doing?

splashpot · #20 03-25-2005, 05:01 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Wow, you must suck at poker.

[/ QUOTE ]

Just trying to give helpful advice, tailored to the person who asked for it.

What is it that you're doing?

[/ QUOTE ]

Telling people that extremely weak players equates to a crapshoot is not helpful advice. Do you see why? I'll let others elaborate.