Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Mid- and High-Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #151  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:28 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Hi tolbiny:

The flaw in your argument is that you are comparing with how a hand should be played versus how typical players do play them. So while I agree with you that it is probably best to check and call with a weak ace, in my experience most aggressive players rarely do this.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #152  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:32 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Hi JV:

While it's true that many players do play differently against me, at the $80 game almost all players are aggressive with some being clearly too aggressive, and many of them try to be tricky.

You need to keep in mind that I'm not in most pots and I do pay attention some of the time.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #153  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:40 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Hi JV:

This is actually a different topic. Over the years there has been some animosity displayed towards us on the Internet. In my opinion, one of the main reasons for this is simply that our success does make it more difficult for someone new to break in. We're aware of this and are trying to open the door for some new talented people. Ed Miller is a good example as well as some of the posters whose articles we published in our new Internet magazine.

Thanks for your post and best wishes,

Mason
Reply With Quote
  #154  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:42 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Final Comment

Hi Josh:

He had three aces, not a pair of aces. I doubt that anyone in this game, including me, would have made this fold.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #155  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:46 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Final Comment

Hi etizzle:

Your scenario is certainly a possibility. However, it's my experience that the unknown players in this game don't think at that level. They assume that if you have some like kings, you'll at least call the flop raise.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #156  
Old 01-11-2005, 06:57 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Hi elindauer:

You wrote:

[ QUOTE ]
AJ? No way. Maybe he gets tricky and just calls the flop, but now that he fills up and holds ALL the good cards, he bets out?! I don't think so.

[/ QUOTE ]

I disagree. Given the way he played the flop, ace-jack becomes more likely. Furthermore, if he wasn't mentally prepared for how to handle an ace on the turn, I think a bet now becomes likely.

[ QUOTE ]
Note that you would definitely raise if you knew you could fold to a 3-bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is probably correct.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #157  
Old 01-11-2005, 07:05 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Hi elindauer:

I think the real value in this discussion are all the variables that need to be considered and the weight each variable should receive. Notice that once all the variables are stated it becomes difficult to disagree with any of them. So if there were any variables that you missed, then there is a lot of value here.

On the other hand, how important each variable is can actually be the subject of a lot of debate and these arguments can be quite confusing even to expert players. So that part of the discussion may or may not have real value for you. This would depend on your experience and general knowledge of the game. Also, slight differences in opinion can dramatically change the way a hand should be played.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #158  
Old 01-11-2005, 07:09 AM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Metagame considerations

Hi Gamblor:

I don't think so. I'm not known to sit in these games for many hours at a time, or day after day. What you're suggesting isn't the right strategy for me, especially against someone I'm not familiar with. There are some other regulars that it might be more appropriate for.

Interesting post nonetheless.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #159  
Old 01-11-2005, 07:19 AM
tolbiny tolbiny is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 52
Default Re: Hand to Talk About

Mason-
I haven't taken the time to read the whole thread, skimmed about half of it. I didn't see you describe him (or specifically the game) as "aggressive". Lately in my 10-20 games i have seen the few aggressive players around me go for more raises or c/r on the turn, with weaker hands like top pair.
My thinking when i first read your post was that he could have a fairly wide range of hands on the flop- but when he bets out on the turn its screams "Ace" to me. My initial impression was that he saw his trips and didn't want to have the hand checked through, he also doesn't want to get raised, but that thought should come to him second after the, "i don't want this to get checked through" goes through his mind.
That was just my impression reading the post initially, which is probably close to what i would read at the table. If i think he is the type of player to go on first impressions, then i go with mine.
Reply With Quote
  #160  
Old 01-11-2005, 09:46 AM
SA125 SA125 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 171
Default Diablo nails it

I doubt there's anyone, other than Mason, who can honestly say that they agree the river call is correct and Diablo's take on the play is wrong.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions Inc.