|
|
#122
04-28-2005, 09:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The chat
I THINK: (raptor plz dont post telling me Im wrong) that with 15K on the line and the presurre of a higher step 5 really does affect u( lots of ppl watching ), Its much easier for me to believe they play scared than theyre morons.
|
|
#124
04-28-2005, 09:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: The chat
[ QUOTE ]
how do u get rid of it in hand history? [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, if someone can post the hand history of this thing it would be great for those of us who are working *ahem*yesIwork*ahem* and couldn't watch the festivities... Yugoslav
|
|
#126
04-28-2005, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL STEP 5 HIGHER THREAD--9PM EST TONIGHT***
[ QUOTE ]
gbertell played WAY too weak HU. He was totally outclassed there. eastbay [/ QUOTE ] gbertell had won a step 4 RIGHT before this one started. At one point on 100/200 in that tourney, he reraised all in from BB w t1000 to the SB, who raised to t500 and had t900 or so. The gber had 69 of spades, which flushed to beat AK...he wasn't that good.
|
|
#127
04-28-2005, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL STEP 5 HIGHER THREAD--9PM EST TONIGHT***
I KNEW he didnt have a queen, but maybe he could have had 77 or somethign else so its tough to call with K-high.( a bit easier with A-high)
|
|
#128
04-28-2005, 09:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how much rake to PP did that represent
Not just the $5k for the tournament, but all of the rake collected at the hundreds of step tables that led to this one sng...
|
|
#129
04-28-2005, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how much rake to PP did that represent
[ QUOTE ]
Not just the $5k for the tournament, but all of the rake collected at the hundreds of step tables that led to this one sng... [/ QUOTE ] i'd say about a trillion dollars.
|
|
#130
04-28-2005, 09:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: ***OFFICIAL STEP 5 HIGHER THREAD--9PM EST TONIGHT***
How about that Q,10 call by the big stack from the BB against the eventual winner's QQ? That's got to hurt.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
