|
|
#111
08-24-2005, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
If anyone plays 100K hands at NL50 or NL100 they will have to answer to me personally. Everyone on here should be moving up well before 100K hands at any level. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds like a personal challenge. 
|
|
#112
08-24-2005, 01:27 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If anyone plays 100K hands at NL50 or NL100 they will have to answer to me personally. Everyone on here should be moving up well before 100K hands at any level. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds like a personal challenge. [/ QUOTE ] To clarify, I meant 100K winning hands. If you're struggling to win, then by all means don't move up. Grouchie, you'll be playing NL1K in no time, I'm sure. And change your avatar.
|
|
#113
08-24-2005, 01:52 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anyone plays 100K hands at NL50 or NL100 they will have to answer to me personally. Everyone on here should be moving up well before 100K hands at any level. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds like a personal challenge. [/ QUOTE ] To clarify, I meant 100K winning hands. If you're struggling to win, then by all means don't move up. Grouchie, you'll be playing NL1K in no time, I'm sure. And change your avatar. [/ QUOTE ] Nah, if i ever play NL1k it'll be some drunken tilt playing way outside my bankroll session. I'd be happy if i can get good enough to just make it to NL200 sometime within the next 3 years/500k hands heh. And, as for the avatar, i'm looking for a new one.
|
|
#114
08-24-2005, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] If anyone plays 100K hands at NL50 or NL100 they will have to answer to me personally. Everyone on here should be moving up well before 100K hands at any level. [/ QUOTE ] This sounds like a personal challenge. [/ QUOTE ] To clarify, I meant 100K winning hands. If you're struggling to win, then by all means don't move up. Grouchie, you'll be playing NL1K in no time, I'm sure. And change your avatar. [/ QUOTE ] I have 110k winning hands at NL50.
|
|
#115
08-24-2005, 02:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
I have 110k winning hands at NL50. [/ QUOTE ] That sucks. You cost yourself a lot of money.
|
|
#116
08-24-2005, 02:06 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I have 110k winning hands at NL50. [/ QUOTE ] That sucks. You cost yourself a lot of money. [/ QUOTE ] I'll move up eventually. Don't get me wrong, I have played alot of NL100 too, but so far, I have found my optimum level $/hour-wise, is 8-tableing the NL50s.
|
|
#117
08-24-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
so far, I have found my optimum level $/hour-wise, is 8-tableing the NL50s. [/ QUOTE ] I promise you it isn't.
|
|
#118
08-24-2005, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] so far, I have found my optimum level $/hour-wise, is 8-tableing the NL50s. [/ QUOTE ] I promise you it isn't. [/ QUOTE ] If my only options were playing the NL50s or 100s, I have a large sample size saying I make more at the 50s. And right now, I don't really have time to get a roll for the 200+ games.
|
|
#119
08-24-2005, 02:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: jkkkk\'s ADNLHOC
[ QUOTE ]
If my only options were playing the NL50s or 100s, I have a large sample size saying I make more at the 50s. [/ QUOTE ] This is because you're 8 tabling instead of working on your game. [ QUOTE ] And right now, I don't really have time to get a roll for the 200+ games. [/ QUOTE ] So is this.
|
|
#120
08-24-2005, 04:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
you are a hairy animal manbeast. ni han. n/t
sdf
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
