Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #111  
Old 08-04-2005, 09:31 PM
jman220 jman220 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: No Poker Sept-May
Posts: 822
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really hope Kevin Bacon pays up.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]


[/ QUOTE ]
Reply With Quote
  #112  
Old 08-05-2005, 12:33 AM
boose_bagina boose_bagina is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 253
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really hope Neil Young
steve young
steve and edie
eddie george
george burns
pays up.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP...ten bucks to everyone if we can get to someone obscure like George Burns within the next ten fixes [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP now pay up before I expose you to all of 2+2 as a deadbeat [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]and the most obscure connection in the world goes too...steve and edie

unfortunatly, edie gorme of steve lawrence and eydie gorme is spelt, well, with that darn "y". so due to my non explicit T&C's, your post is invalid...(phew, got myself out of ten bucks there)
Reply With Quote
  #113  
Old 08-05-2005, 12:58 AM
newfant newfant is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 637
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

The use of "force or fear" has to be "wrongful." It's not wrongful to say someone hasn't paid you back when they haven't paid you back. It is just stating the facts.
Reply With Quote
  #114  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:22 AM
captZEEbo1 captZEEbo1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 264
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
Staked people fourtimes(just for a night's play). Two of them lost, two of them won. No biggie. All gave me back what they had left, or the original stake plus 50%.

[/ QUOTE ]

did it end up profitable?
Reply With Quote
  #115  
Old 08-05-2005, 10:27 AM
pudley4 pudley4 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Mpls, MN
Posts: 1,270
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really hope Neil Young
steve young
steve and edie
eddie george
george burns
pays up.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP...ten bucks to everyone if we can get to someone obscure like George Burns within the next ten fixes [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP now pay up before I expose you to all of 2+2 as a deadbeat [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]and the most obscure connection in the world goes too...steve and edie

unfortunatly, edie gorme of steve lawrence and eydie gorme is spelt, well, with that darn "y". so due to my non explicit T&C's, your post is invalid...(phew, got myself out of ten bucks there)

[/ QUOTE ]

Neil Young
Neil Patrick Harris
Ed Harris
Ed Burns
George Burns
Reply With Quote
  #116  
Old 08-05-2005, 03:37 PM
boose_bagina boose_bagina is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Toronto
Posts: 253
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I really hope Neil Young
steve young
steve and edie
eddie george
george burns
pays up.

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]

FYP

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP...ten bucks to everyone if we can get to someone obscure like George Burns within the next ten fixes [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]
FYP now pay up before I expose you to all of 2+2 as a deadbeat [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]and the most obscure connection in the world goes too...steve and edie

unfortunatly, edie gorme of steve lawrence and eydie gorme is spelt, well, with that darn "y". so due to my non explicit T&C's, your post is invalid...(phew, got myself out of ten bucks there)

[/ QUOTE ]

Neil Young
Neil Patrick Harris
Ed Harris
Ed Burns
George Burns

[/ QUOTE ]
nicely done [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

...but, to be technical (i really need this ten bucks), according to imdb.com, its ed harris, and edward burns...but i'm just being anal...good job. checks are in the mail.
Reply With Quote
  #117  
Old 08-05-2005, 04:21 PM
StellarWind StellarWind is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 704
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
The use of "force or fear" has to be "wrongful." It's not wrongful to say someone hasn't paid you back when they haven't paid you back. It is just stating the facts.

[/ QUOTE ]
So you are saying it is legal to blackmail someone so long as you only threaten to publicly humiliate him by stating true facts?

That would allow me to start a nice business taking pictures outside a no-tell motel and blackmailing the married men I caught. It would be completely true but I suspect you would agree that it's illegal.

What's wrongful is the threat, not the action being threatened. If I want to take pictures and ruin marriages I can do it. I can also show the men the pictures and tell them I'm sending them to their wives. It's all free speech. But I cross the line when I demand money in exchange for my silence.

Would it have been legal for OP to demand full payment and an additional $10000 in return for his silence? Or would you agree that is extortion?

I know everyone wants to believe that OP's entitled to do this because he's owed the money. Morally I might agree with you. But legally there is no difference between extorting repayment of a debt and extorting something you were never entitled to. Extortion is legally a form of theft that is achieved by threatening the victim. It's illegal to steal back money you are owed.
Reply With Quote
  #118  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:41 PM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,298
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
eh it's all expected value. you expected to make something off him. it didn't work out. such is life.

[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't make it a smart move which is Mason's point. I know that's his point because we've discussed this many times over the many years that this site has been in existance.
Reply With Quote
  #119  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:43 PM
sthief09 sthief09 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: duffman is thrusting in the direction of the problem (mets are 9-13, currently on a 1 game winning streak)
Posts: 1,245
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
eh it's all expected value. you expected to make something off him. it didn't work out. such is life.

[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't make it a smart move which is Mason's point. I know that's his point because we've discussed this many times over the many years that this site has been in existance.

[/ QUOTE ]


extreme example:

someone wants to borrow $1 from you. 50% of the time he'll screw you over, and 50% of the time he'll return $1.10 plus the original $1, so you're expected to make a nickel. whether or not he pays you back is irrelavent when analyzing your decision to stake the guy $1. in other words, if you can afford the variance, you should take it as long as you've correctly analyzed the decision. if, 5 years later, you look at your decision, and he didn't pay you back, it doesn't mean you made a bad decision. it just means you had bad luck
Reply With Quote
  #120  
Old 08-05-2005, 06:45 PM
adios adios is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 2,298
Default Re: Scammed by a 2+2er

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
eh it's all expected value. you expected to make something off him. it didn't work out. such is life.

[/ QUOTE ]

This doesn't make it a smart move which is Mason's point. I know that's his point because we've discussed this many times over the many years that this site has been in existance.

[/ QUOTE ]


extreme example:

someone wants to borrow $1 from you. 50% of the time he'll screw you over, and 50% of the time it'll return $1.10. whether or not he pays you back is irrelavent when analyzing your decision to stake the guy $1. in other words, if you can afford the variance, you should take it as long as you've correctly analyzed the decision

[/ QUOTE ]

His point is that your EV is decidedly negative in making these arrangements. It's not a variance issue, it's an EV issue.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:49 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.