|
|
#102
08-23-2005, 04:55 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
SAT's are a poor measure of intelligence. although there is clearly some coorelation, theres tons of room for error.
one retard i knew went from a very low 1100's score to a mid 1300's, and i've know several people to make that jump look like a baby step better to have a poll of IQ scores in a percentile format. |
|
#103
08-23-2005, 04:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
[ QUOTE ]
More importantly, the SAT was re-centered in the mid 90s because our nation's increasingly poor students scored lower on it with each successive year. So a 1200 in 1991 is a much better score than a 1200 in 1997 which further screws with your data. [/ QUOTE ] I was going to call BS on all these scores, because back when I took the test in 1988, 1150 was not a bad score. This makes me feel less stupid. |
|
#104
08-23-2005, 05:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] citanul Carpal \'Tunnel Reged: 07/24/03 Posts: 3445 Loc: I hate Messy_Jesse and Myst [/ QUOTE ] lol. holla [/ QUOTE ] LMAO! |
|
#105
08-23-2005, 05:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] More importantly, the SAT was re-centered in the mid 90s because our nation's increasingly poor students scored lower on it with each successive year. So a 1200 in 1991 is a much better score than a 1200 in 1997 which further screws with your data. [/ QUOTE ] I was going to call BS on all these scores, because back when I took the test in 1988, 1150 was not a bad score. This makes me feel less stupid. [/ QUOTE ] an 1150 is still a good score, fwiw. holla |
|
#109
08-23-2005, 06:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
The only important thing about this entire poll is this:
High SAT scores do not correlate to poker ability. I know, because I have one and not the other. Care to guess which one? Sigma |
|
#110
08-23-2005, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 2+2: How smart are YOU?
1550+ pwnz j00 all!
Then again, it is out of 2400 now. :P |
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
