|
|
#101
03-20-2005, 07:01 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Party Bonus, 20% to $200, 7x
[ QUOTE ]
Bump!! Next poster whill be # 100 since I am 99 [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] ME ME ME!!! What do I win!!?? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img] 
|
|
#102
03-20-2005, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Bonus, 20% to $200, 7x
200 hands to go... -410$ so far... I am so good at this game
|
|
#103
03-20-2005, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
787 hands in, 642 raked, +$2,140. Best 2-day run in almost a year. And I got the $200 bonus coming soon too!
|
|
#104
03-20-2005, 07:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
$15/$30?
Why does party and empire do 15% and 20% reloads. Wouldnt it be cheaper to just do higher %. I bet the neteller fees for reload is high for them. I transfer the money and then right back out. I have funds there to play with. I just transfer for the bonus.
|
|
#105
03-21-2005, 12:42 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
pmub
|
|
#106
03-21-2005, 01:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
Damn it, I thought it was 100 bucks only, so I only deposited 500.
|
|
#107
03-21-2005, 03:40 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
The higher the WR, the more likely the bonus won't get cleared, or the player will go bust.
|
|
#109
03-21-2005, 02:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Zero Downside
Well assuming 20% to $200 or 50% to $200 and the same clearing requirements, the player depositing $400 is more likely to bust if he plays above his deposit.
However, many people may not have or wish to deposit $1,000 into a shady online poker site. Or maybe it's just making the fish deposit more money (which I have no qualms with).
|
|
#110
03-21-2005, 08:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Party Bonus, 20% to $200, 7x
The Party bonus is clear all required hands or nothing, right? Not like UB which gives partial credit, if you will.
Thanks for the help.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
