|
|
#104
02-01-2004, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can\'t get it to play
I just had an idea. I think they should put the bot into the 2+2 table and we all share our cards with each other and see how it does.
We'd probably do equally well if we didn't share our cards with each other. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] It's because we make these novice plays like playing AA from EP, when obviously we don't have "perfect pot odds". |
|
#105
02-01-2004, 07:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: To WinHoldemSupport
no i would not ... but if you're going to enlist the help of a piece of artificial intelligence to help you win at poker don't you want it to be able to handle any possible table condtions including the fact that some or all of the chairs are teamed against you? wh was developed under the premise that other chairs are cardsharing against you ... and since wh cannot confirm who is or is not teamed against you ... it takes the very conservative approach and assumes they are all sharing ... (which is probably not the case) ... and that is why it is do dang tight out of the box
|
|
#107
02-01-2004, 07:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Collusion information
on the internet you do not get to decide what i do with my card property ... it is my sole property to do with as i please ... i legally acquired that knowledge property with blinds or ante or rake or all three. and absolutely nobody can tell me what i will or will not do with my property. if i choose to keep my hand a secret it is my choice. if i choose to team up with another that is also my choice and theirs. i can't force anybody to team with me. and they cannot force me to team with them. it is by mutual consent. wh just makes it convenient for players who want to team.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
