#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
http://www.narth.com/docs/normalization.html [/ QUOTE ] NARTH - National Association for Reasearch and Therapy of Homosexuality. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] Blacks are normal. Homosexuals are normal. I don't care what Dr. Ihatefags says -- he's an ignorant moron too. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
Homosexuals are normal. [/ QUOTE ] Let's play a little game...tell me where in this list things stop being 'normal' People with a foot fetish People with ADHD People with a vomit fetish People with dyslexia People with personality disorders People who get off on scat porn Middle aged men who like to be dressed up in nappies and spanked (I know you're reading this mr. Skalansky, you naughty boy). People with schizophrenia People who can't get an orgasm without choking themselves during the act. People who partake in consensual cannabalism (of deceased carcasses) |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
I don't care what Dr. Ihatefags says -- he's an ignorant moron too. [/ QUOTE ] Be ignorance thy choice, where knowledge leads to woe. |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
The above post resembles the philospohy of General Nathan Bedford Forest.
|
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Homosexuals are normal. [/ QUOTE ] Let's play a little game...tell me where in this list things stop being 'normal' [/ QUOTE ] I'll answer after you do: People with Asymetrical facial features People with Blonde hair People with Detached earlobes People with Left-handedness People with Color-blindness People with Type O- blood PS: Just because something isn't "common" doesn't mean it's not "normal". |
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
PS: Just because something isn't "common" doesn't mean it's not "normal". [/ QUOTE ] http://www.devbio.com/article.php?id=169 |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
you should kill yourself. racism is out of style now, pops.
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
I think the best treatment if this topic was done by Herrnstein and Murray in the Bell Curve. The book was very controversial but ultimately rooted in complex research and careful reasoning. Kind of sad though.
|
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
All that needs to be said is that a major factor in the IQ of a new born child is the genetics he inherits from his parents.
If a brilliant white man and a brilliant black woman have a child, there is an excellent chance that child will have a very high IQ and be extremely intelligent. With this said, if a particular race already has a higher overall IQ (and this has already been tested) then it follows that the offspring of this race will ALWAYS retain the higher IQ based on genetics. Someone made a point earlier about different breeds of dogs, and I think it is exactly the same here. Some dogs are more athletic than others and other dogs are much more intelligent than others. I see no reason why this cannot also be true in humans. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: This Ought To Get Some Replies
[ QUOTE ]
All that needs to be said is that a major factor in the IQ of a new born child is the genetics he inherits from his parents. [/ QUOTE ] Pre and postnatal nutrition, enrichment, etc. play no role? [ QUOTE ] With this said, if a particular race already has a higher overall IQ (and this has already been tested) [/ QUOTE ] There are some flaws in those studies you are referring to. [ QUOTE ] then it follows that the offspring of this race will ALWAYS retain the higher IQ based on genetics. [/ QUOTE ] Again, IQ is not just genetics. [ QUOTE ] Someone made a point earlier about different breeds of dogs, and I think it is exactly the same here. Some dogs are more athletic than others and other dogs are much more intelligent than others. I see no reason why this cannot also be true in humans. [/ QUOTE ] While it may be a cute analogy, you do see large differences between race of humans and breed of dog, don't you? While you can imagine a reproductively isolated group of people where they are selected for mathematical reasoning, etc. could eventually develop into a breed of Sklanskys, there are major, major differences with that and the evolutionary history of the races. Each race (if you can even define them) has elements of it that have evolved in wildly different niches with wildly different selection pressures (I'm reminded of the east africa/west africa running skills post in the race and athleticism thread) and there has been a large amount of confounding factors (outbreeding, culture, etc.) that really ruin the analogy. Do genetics play a role in nonpathological intelligence differences? Most likely. Can you apply these genetic differences to race? No way. |
|
|