#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged *DELETED*
It is sad that party and stars are rigged. I can't prove it and I wish they weren't but there are too many unusual events (especially with all-ins in the tourneys).
This is also why they are the biggest sites, due to the sucessful "evening out" distribution of money to the players. ie. strong players win less than they should and weak players lose less than they should. That is why I play on other servers. |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged
Since what we (stars) do is so obvious to you, then it won't be very hard for you to prove it then by showing us the clear anomolies in your hand histories. (Assuming sample size not too small)
Simply send an email to support and we will send you all your hand histories for review. You don't even need to mention this post... |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged *DELETED*
*********** # 1 **************
PokerStars Game #2820330724: Tournament #13821765, Hold'em No Limit - Level VII (100/200) - 2005/10/16 - 19:12:58 (ET) Table '13821765 38' Seat #8 is the button Seat 1: ludonja (28865 in chips) Seat 2: ballarat (10115 in chips) Seat 3: Eder (4405 in chips) Seat 4: TxDozerMan (24606 in chips) Seat 5: heusden (12600 in chips) Seat 6: Brawnson (23015 in chips) Seat 7: SHACA (10035 in chips) Seat 8: gregisme56 (6185 in chips) Seat 9: Sweetwater44 (1790 in chips) ludonja: posts the ante 25 ballarat: posts the ante 25 Eder: posts the ante 25 TxDozerMan: posts the ante 25 heusden: posts the ante 25 Brawnson: posts the ante 25 SHACA: posts the ante 25 gregisme56: posts the ante 25 Sweetwater44: posts the ante 25 Sweetwater44: posts small blind 100 ludonja: posts big blind 200 *** HOLE CARDS *** Dealt to Eder [As Ad] ballarat: folds Eder: calls 200 TxDozerMan: folds heusden: raises 200 to 400 Brawnson: calls 400 SHACA: folds gregisme56: folds Sweetwater44: folds ludonja: calls 200 Eder: raises 3980 to 4380 and is all-in heusden: calls 3980 Brawnson: folds ludonja: folds *** FLOP *** [6c Jd Kh] *** TURN *** [6c Jd Kh] [Qs] *** RIVER *** [6c Jd Kh Qs] [7h] *** SHOW DOWN *** Eder: shows [As Ad] (a pair of Aces) heusden: shows [Ks Qh] (two pair, Kings and Queens) heusden collected 9885 from pot <font color="red"> 5 for 5 this weekend </font> |
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
Eder: shows [As Ad] (a pair of Aces) heusden: shows [Ks Qh] (two pair, Kings and Queens) heusden collected 9885 from pot 5 for 5 this weekend [/ QUOTE ] Clearly you forgot about the last 10 times you were dealt AA, where you won. Infact the last time you lost with AA was 2005/09/24 - 23:39:10. Edit, yes it is possible that you are just talking about "out draws" in general. You don't specifically mention losing 5/5 with AA. If so then I humbly appologise. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Likely Not Rigged
I'm not convinced that any auditors have seen source code.
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Eder: shows [As Ad] (a pair of Aces) heusden: shows [Ks Qh] (two pair, Kings and Queens) heusden collected 9885 from pot 5 for 5 this weekend [/ QUOTE ] Clearly you forgot about the last 10 times you were dealt AA, where you won. Infact the last time you lost with AA was 2005/09/24 - 23:39:10. Edit, yes it is possible that you are just talking about "out draws" in general. You don't specifically mention losing 5/5 with AA. If so then I humbly appologise. [/ QUOTE ] I posted for twisted humor to amuse myself at work....I play Pstars and am happy to be there. The 5/5 is regarding 5 similar tourney exits in a row this weekend, 2 AA, 3 KK money in preflop on 3 different sites...guess they're all rigged lol. cheers! |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Likely Not Rigged
from http://www.pokerstars.com/rng_audit.html
"Cigital analyzed the source code, entropy sources and documentation for PokerStars' RNG implementation. In addition, a sample RNG output stream provided by PokerStars was subjected to - and passed - FIPS 140-1 testing. Using standard methods for exploiting RNGs and having full access to the source code, Cigital was unable to break the PokerStars RNG. Cigital found that the PokerStars implementation adheres to the current state-of-the-practice in generating random seeding values." |
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Likely Not Rigged
Good deal. Stars has maybe been honestly audited. I've done my own tests there and have no doubts.
I'd bet my bankroll that the same is not true for Party. |
#100
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Pokerstars Is Rigged *DELETED*
[ QUOTE ]
It is sad that party and stars are rigged. I can't prove it and I wish they weren't but there are too many unusual events (especially with all-ins in the tourneys). This is also why they are the biggest sites, due to the sucessful "evening out" distribution of money to the players. ie. strong players win less than they should and weak players lose less than they should. That is why I'm a losing poker player. [/ QUOTE ] fixed. apologies if I missed the sarcasm |
|
|