#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> </font><blockquote><font class="small">In risposta di:</font><hr /> I would be interested to hear any high-limit online players comment on this thread on neverwinpoker. Dan Druff, aka Todd Witteles, 2005 WSOP bracelet winner, has been running so bad in the Stars 100/200 than he is entertaining some notions about a "kill switch" that makes certain players lose. He does NOT say he believes in it, but he seems to be seriously considering it as an idea. Notice he doesn't have pokertracker, so there isn't any hard data. thread is here [/ QUOTE ] Most likely Dan Druff is just hamming it up for all the broke ass idiots on that site. If he was REALLY that upset about all of these beats it would shock me. [/ QUOTE ] When you are losing $1000s day in day out while playing your A game against retards it's very easy to start thinking all kinds of crazy things. [/ QUOTE ] I imagine, Dan, like many other players (including some of the most respected 2+2ers) vastly underestimates the variance inherent in poker. [/ QUOTE ] This is why some of us play NL. [/ QUOTE ] and take a huge pay cut [/ QUOTE ] "LOL" [/ QUOTE ] ok, i was wrong. i should have said "and take a pay cut." |
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
and Hobbes needs to be put to sleep. Recent events have shown us that friendships with tigers just don't work out. [/ QUOTE ] YOU $%#%&*(& #$@$%@ #$%%@ &*$%@#%. I KNOW WHERE YOU LIVE. May a thousand cats scratch up your BMW. Meow. |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
I read the thread,I know many of you guys are making a ton of money on-line, but I have to agree, I see much more of this stuff on-line than I do live and I have logged 50K plus hands live
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
ok, i was wrong. i should have said "and take a pay cut." [/ QUOTE ] No, you should have said nothing at all. A good player with $Xk will make more per hour at NL than at limit. End. |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
I too have entertained the idea of a kill switch, but have come to the conclusion that the variation is due to 4 factors. One more fish. 2 money seems fake so fish take even bigger chances and 3 schooling of fish taken away value and 4 No table image or reads available. That is why i play more live then online. I done hours and see my live game has been a lot more profitble. I still play online but if i have a choice it will always be live....
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
I too have entertained the idea of a kill switch, but have come to the conclusion that the variation is due to 4 factors. One more fish. 2 money seems fake so fish take even bigger chances [/ QUOTE ] you play online and live and think there are more fish online?! |
#97
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
id say there are just much fewer vgood players live.
|
#98
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] ok, i was wrong. i should have said "and take a pay cut." [/ QUOTE ] No, you should have said nothing at all. A good player with $Xk will make more per hour at NL than at limit. End. [/ QUOTE ] Please explain this to a slow person like me: All online sites I look at, the average pot size is higher at the limit games than the NL games (often by a factor of 4). Is the overlay really that much bigger for a god NL player? |
#99
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Dan Druff and Stars 100/200
Yes
|
|
|