Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-18-2004, 12:13 PM
Bozeman Bozeman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: On the road again
Posts: 1,213
Default Re: Standard Deviation

You should only expect to make a pair (or two pair, trips, or quads) with an unpaired hand on the flop 32.43% of the time, so you are actually getting luckier than average here.
In addition, if you always raise with these hands preflop, you will see somewhat less than this because when people play against you it is somehat more likely that they will have some of your aces, kings, and queens.

33K hands is a rational sample size, but it still will have reasonable expected deviation.

Craig
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-18-2004, 06:32 PM
MyNameIsMud MyNameIsMud is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Standard Deviation

[ QUOTE ]
You should only expect to make a pair (or two pair, trips, or quads) with an unpaired hand on the flop 32.43% of the time

[/ QUOTE ]

Can you show me how you come up with 32.43?

-MyNameIsMud
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-18-2004, 06:45 PM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Standard Deviation

This is 1-P(the 6 cards that match yours do not show up on the flop):

1-(44/50)*(43/49)*(42/48)=0.32428

or about 32.43%

Bozeman would not steer you wrong on this kind of problem.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-19-2004, 02:26 PM
DPCondit DPCondit is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 270
Default Re: Standard Deviation

[ QUOTE ]
In addition, if you always raise with these hands preflop, you will see somewhat less than this because when people play against you it is somehat more likely that they will have some of your aces, kings, and queens.


[/ QUOTE ]

Yes, that is exactly what I was going to say. Good point. These are not showdown simulations. Some times you won't even see a flop when you have premium cards. On the actual flops seen, you should expect a lower number of premium cards. Unless there is a flop 100% of the time, then you cannot logically expect there to be as many aces, kings, and queens.

Don
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-19-2004, 08:56 PM
Thythe Thythe is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 432
Default Re: Standard Deviation

On the non math side of this question (it's long since left the front page of the zoo), Party has no incentive to give you LESS sets. If it wanted to cheat it should give you MORE sets and have them be beaten by flushes/straights by the river. The goal would be to increase the rake of course, but if you aren't making sets, then you are folding and not contributing much more money to the pot.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-20-2004, 05:35 PM
delirium delirium is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Standard Deviation

Actually, if Party wanted to cheat (and not be obvious, obviously), then the best way might actually be to even up the game among the players. Standard statistically random shuffle, but distribute the hands in such a way as to help the weaker players and handicap the stronger players. That way everyone plays longer (swapping the same money more or less around the ring) and Party increases its rake.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:55 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.