|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad
The equity value assumes you see all five board cards. Some hands won't manage that, which is why small suited connectors usually stink so bad in SNGs and why LHE players sometimes have a hard time adjusting.
Lori |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad
[ QUOTE ]
The equity value assumes you see all five board cards. Some hands won't manage that, which is why small suited connectors usually stink so bad in SNGs and why LHE players sometimes have a hard time adjusting. Lori [/ QUOTE ] I realize that. However, does this mean we should pay little attention to the difference between AKs and AKo? Same principle applies there. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad
I could happily play a SNG where I didn't know the suits of my cards until after the flop was dealt. I don't think it would impact me much at all, except possibly heads up.
I think that you have to play your opponent's range, because if you are not called, it does not matter what you are holding. Of course, working out your opponent's range is the tricky bit [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Lori |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Question about hand ranges & equity (calling vs. raising, yada yad
I dunno, Lori. The difference between being suited and unsuited is pretty important, even in NL. The difference is comparable to TT vs. 77 (not vs. each other, of course).
|
|
|