#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] game liquidity at ALL ring games is much better at Party. [/ QUOTE ] FYP [/ QUOTE ] ISSCKM [/ QUOTE ] FYP |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: ?
I should seriously consider killing him.
Fixed Your Thread. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
is stars like party where it counts one person 4 tabling as 4 people?
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
is stars like party where it counts one person 4 tabling as 4 people? [/ QUOTE ] It must be. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
As we speak 70k Stars vs 68k Party. nh ToT [/ QUOTE ] Sample size |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Hint to Lee: double FPP for $3 raked hands, you need more mid/high limit players. [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] Actually... don't you need more fish? I'm not saying there are none, but there could always be a little more. Am i right, or am i right... or am i right???? [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] This will attract fish as much as it will attract sharks. Quicker to get that TV etc.. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
Awhile back, I claimed that Stars would be the undisputed bigger site by the end of January. Quite a few disagreed if I remember correctly.
Still, Party is much larger if you are talking about mid-high limit games, though if Stars gradually starts to surpass Party and it becomes accepted, that will change too. Interestingly, I only ever made the claim that Stars would surpass party because I was talking about the "world's biggest poker room" banner that Party always has displayed, and what stars would do when they surpassed them. ... And I notice that Stars now has, at the very top of their website... "three world Champions welcome you to the World's Largest Poker Website" In terms of sheer numbers, anybody still think Party will be bigger by Feb 1? Fidel |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
Still, Party is much larger if you are talking about mid-high limit games, though if Stars gradually starts to surpass Party and it becomes accepted, that will change too.
this will never happen. do you see why? <font color="white">RB </font> |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
from the 70K on Stars 55 K play on microlimits that Party dont offer [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]. At sample PL 25 Stars NO table. Guess for NORMAL RINGGAMES stars is not bogger than Paradise pokerroom.
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
Perhaps if you let affiliates share in their players' MGR, we might have a little more incentive to send new players your way...
|
|
|