|
|
|
|
#1
12-28-2005, 01:41 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Bankroll Requirements
I agree with grunch, if you are gonna buy in short what is the reason for going with 50 bets? You dont accomplish becoming the short stack, and you dont have the stack to maximize your value on those hands where you are super strong and get unlimited action. This seems to be the worst of both worlds. Your better off buying for 25 or 100 bets.
|
|
#2
12-28-2005, 01:58 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll Requirements
this has turned from a basic "look to the FAQ" question into a pretty nice discussion on the cost/benefit on buying in short.
since i can't really add anything constructive, i think that the mods should consider this thread for the digest.
|
|
#3
12-28-2005, 02:09 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Bankroll Requirements
[ QUOTE ]
I agree with grunch, if you are gonna buy in short what is the reason for going with 50 bets? You dont accomplish becoming the short stack, and you dont have the stack to maximize your value on those hands where you are super strong and get unlimited action. This seems to be the worst of both worlds. Your better off buying for 25 or 100 bets. [/ QUOTE ] Buying in for 50BB instead of 100BB certainly strips away implied odds for large stacks looking to play speculative hands. If it takes away enough implied odds to be effective, then playing with 50BB has the same benefits as playing with 25BB but with all the benefits that come with a larger stack. I think it's incorrect to think that it's always best to start with 100BB, or always correct to start with 25BB, or always correct to start with either 100BB or 25BB. It's table dependant, and in some cases 50BB is probably optimal, but it depends on specific opponents.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
