![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Ted Rall is one of the most passionate, articulate writers we have in America today. He understands democracy and exposes those who wish to slowly repeal it. [/ QUOTE ] Good to see you've cemented yourself as a troll. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Ted Rall is one of the most passionate, articulate writers we have in America today. He understands democracy and exposes those who wish to slowly repeal it. [/ QUOTE ] Good to see you've cemented yourself as a troll. [/ QUOTE ] Having an opinion makes one a troll? I assume what you really mean to say is: having an opinion I don't like = troll. Correct? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Having an opinion makes one a troll? I assume what you really mean to say is: having an opinion I don't like = troll. Correct? [/ QUOTE ] Have you ever read Ted Rall? Btw, his trollishness has been established over a while now. This is just the icing on the trollish cake. If he had replaced "Ted Rall" with "Michael Savage", I would have come to the same conclusion. Both are nutjobs |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Having an opinion makes one a troll? I assume what you really mean to say is: having an opinion I don't like = troll. Correct? [/ QUOTE ] Have you ever read Ted Rall? Btw, his trollishness has been established over a while now. This is just the icing on the trollish cake. If he had replaced "Ted Rall" with "Michael Savage", I would have come to the same conclusion. Both are nutjobs [/ QUOTE ] 1) Yes, I've read Ted Rall. 2) Merely citing/approving/agreeing with nutjobs doesn't make you a troll; it makes you a nutjob, or merely someone who likes and agrees with nutjobs. Maybe we just have different definitions of what a troll is. I think of it as meaning something along the lines of 'someone who posts on a message board with the explicit and obvious purpose of starting a flame war'. I think you use it to mean 'someone I don't agree with.' |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Maybe we just have different definitions of what a troll is. I think of it as meaning something along the lines of 'someone who posts on a message board with the explicit and obvious purpose of starting a flame war'. [/ QUOTE ] No, that's my definition as well. So think. Why did he start this thread about Ted Rall if not to stir the shitpot? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Maybe we just have different definitions of what a troll is. I think of it as meaning something along the lines of 'someone who posts on a message board with the explicit and obvious purpose of starting a flame war'. [/ QUOTE ] No, that's my definition as well. So think. Why did he start this thread about Ted Rall if not to stir the shitpot? [/ QUOTE ] There's a difference between stirring the pot and trying to start a flame war. I'd guess half of the posts on the Politics forum are typically some form of schadenfreude meant to stir the shitpot, as you say. But I assume he started a thread about Ted Rall hoping to start a discussion about Ted Rall and the content of Ted Rall's writing. I get what you're saying, but in many ways this board is one big shitpot that's constantly stirred. I don't think that necessarily means stirring the shitpot is equivalent to intentionally starting a flame war -- let's make a distinction between stirring the shitpot (trying to start discussion that might include barbs thrown back and forth -- that's what politics and jockeying for power is all about, right?) versus a flame war (a post meant merely to upset people). I think we ought to be very careful about what we label as 'flaming' and 'trolling' in the Politics forum; it's much easier to spot in the poker forums (a poster whose only goal is to criticize, name-call, etc. and not contribute to the poker discussion) than it is in the Politics forum -- as a legitimate component of genuine political discouse is strong criticism, vivid dialouge and imagery, etc. I don't have much sympathy for those who come to the Politics forum and find all the debating and arguing in poor taste -- anyone who feels this way has come to the wrong place, IMO. If you see no distinction between the two, that's fine -- if that's the case, however, then there probably isn't anyone here who isn't a troll, because if merely saying you agree, respect, or like Ted Rall constitutes the intentional stirring of the shitpot, which is tantamount to starting a flame war, which makes the poster in question a troll - then we're all guilty of it or something similar, except for those too cowardly or ignorant to have strong opinions. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
So, to answer the OP, I'd like to know what the title of this thread and the content of the OP have to do with each other?
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Its a quote (that is true) from the link I posted.
|
![]() |
|
|