|
View Poll Results: Check below if you're tried this food: | |||
Pig's Feet | 15 | 4.44% | |
Rocky Mountain Oysters | 10 | 2.96% | |
Shark's Fin | 15 | 4.44% | |
Seaweed | 63 | 18.64% | |
Strange organ (elaborate) | 17 | 5.03% | |
Snake | 17 | 5.03% | |
Rabbit | 38 | 11.24% | |
Duck | 67 | 19.82% | |
Alligator | 33 | 9.76% | |
Venison | 63 | 18.64% | |
Voters: 338. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The relationship between MTT and STT play
many many top SNG players have taken to destroying MTT's-obvious simlarities...though i think switching from MTT to SNG would be a lot more difficult as tricky play is not nearly as important or useful-some pro's lag up the sng's but they are definately in the minority of big winners-i'd estimate that standard tag's are in the minority of big MTT winners...
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The relationship between MTT and STT play
I agree, however I would say that TAG MTT play will be more successful than LAG STT play.
That is to say that TAG is good STT and moderately decent MTT play whereas LAG is good MTT but very rarely decent STT play. If that makes sense. STT play comes into play mainly at final tables. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The relationship between MTT and STT play
I play mostly MTTs and thus tend not to do very well in STTs. Not sure why that is. I know that TAG in an MTT has worked fairly well for me, though I would say I am more a Loose TAG, and take a few chances that others may not. I also dont think that STTs have improved my FT play either. I havent made too many FTs on Stars, however on another site, I FT 4 tourneys in a row. I give part of that credit to playing on Stars actually. The better competition translates well to softer sites.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: The relationship between MTT and STT play
[ QUOTE ]
I play mostly MTTs and thus tend not to do very well in STTs. Not sure why that is. I know that TAG in an MTT has worked fairly well for me, though I would say I am more a Loose TAG, and take a few chances that others may not. I also dont think that STTs have improved my FT play either. I havent made too many FTs on Stars, however on another site, I FT 4 tourneys in a row. I give part of that credit to playing on Stars actually. The better competition translates well to softer sites. [/ QUOTE ] not that i'm asking for more STT competition but... i think the main difference is needing to play super ABC tight ass poker for the first few rounds (for all but the highest levels of SNG's where everybody knows all this and tricky play can be rewarded). suited connectors and ATs are out...whereas early in a MTT they can be just the ticket to stack some donkey. going from SNG to MTT has many more collaterals than just bubble or final table (personally i find FT's much different than SNG's because of the constant bubble, huge blinds, great players all around etc etc). learning proper sng play is very close to learning standard TAG MTT play, you just slow it down and drag it out for a longer period...add the element of deep stack play and a few more adjustments. |
|
|