#1
|
|||
|
|||
I think this is right but scuba disagrees
Game No : 3272946676
***** Hand History for Game 3272946676 ***** NL Texas Hold'em $30 Buy-in + $3 Entry Fee Trny:18664529 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) - Wednesday, December 28, 00:51:23 EDT 2005 Table Table 68111 (Real Money) Seat 5 is the button Total number of players : 4 Seat 1: elcheapo23 ( $1617 ) Seat 3: hueys46 ( $4540 ) Seat 5: wnlake5 ( $930 ) Seat 10: Scuba_Chuck ( $913 ) Trny:18664529 Level:6 Blinds(100/200) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to elcheapo23 [ Kh 3d ] >You have options at Table 66918 Table!. hueys46 folds. wnlake5 folds. Scuba_Chuck is all-In [813] elcheapo23 calls [713]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 9d, Jd, Th ] ** Dealing Turn ** [ 7s ] ** Dealing River ** [ Jh ] Scuba_Chuck shows [ Ts, Td ] a full house, Tens full of jacks. elcheapo23 shows [ Kh, 3d ] a pair of jacks. Scuba_Chuck wins 1826 chips from the main pot with a full house, Tens full of jacks. >You have options at Table 66918 Table!. Game #3272948674 starts. 713 to win 1826 and scuba needs to push here. This is a nobrainer and yet he berates me for this call. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
[ QUOTE ]
713 to win 1826 and scuba needs to push here. This is a nobrainer and yet he berates me for this call. [/ QUOTE ] Well, take the 713 back out of that 1826. You're being laid 1113:713, which isn't nearly as attractive. Add in the other severe shorty, and I'm pretty sure your crappy K isn't going to perform well enough to make calling here good. So I think this is poor. EDIT: I'll preempt curtains and point out that this is an SNGPT question if there ever was one. If you don't have it, this isn't a very tough situation to ICM, but I'm lazy and tend to answer based on my intuitions from the time when I actually looked at these kind of things. Serious pushbot minutia aren't so important in regular Stars STT's, at least at low buyins. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
I call this in a flash.
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
EZ fold. Fishy call.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
[ QUOTE ]
713 to win 1826 and scuba needs to push here. This is a nobrainer and yet he berates me for this call. [/ QUOTE ] Except it's not 713 to win 1826. It's 1113 in the pot, 713 to call. You're kinda calculating winning your 'calling' chips back into the equation. You're getting 1.56:1 here, not 1826:713 as you seem to be implying. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
If I fold I'm still midlevel stack. If shortstack had 500 or 600 then the fold would be easier but I think this is the right call because if I'm in scuba's shoes you don't even look at your cards and push
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
Based on what? What a joke.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
I actually see 713 to win 1113 (you cant count the money you havent put in the middle yet) I don't like the call. While he's probably pushing with a very wide range, K3o is defintiely behind.
ICM says : If he's pushing as many as 75% of hands, its still -EV to call with K3o. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
what if its 90%
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I think this is right but scuba disagrees
LOOKS LIKE I AM 2 MINUTES TOO LATE.
|
|
|