I read your argument I understand your point and I have heard the point before. I am not interested in a long winded discussion here. Basically I wish I knew that Harrah's was lying to us and the rules they set out were not set in stone when I was making decisions for thousands of dollars in real money on the bubble of the San Diego Rincon event. I still think what they did was wrong. I guess I am over it though, seeing the broadcast I guess was the end of it for me.

About Hellmuth, I agree that in the short term he is good for poker. Maybe even in the long term, although at some point people are gonna get sick of watching this guy whine.
I still am allowed to hate the guys personality right?
I have met him away from the cameras, he is the type of person I cant stand.

Anyways, I am not saying u are completely wrong here because u are not. Just wanted to state my reasons for what I wrote.

octop · #2 12-27-2005, 12:53 AM

I think harrash should have exepmtions buts its not fair to add them if they werent announced in advance.

wins_pot · #3 12-27-2005, 01:33 PM

I like Phil H and Mike M. They've both been nice to me away from the table, and Phil H has even given me a blurb for my poker novel (Broke: A Poker Novel, coming out mid-06)....

"Excellent, entertaining, and extremely well-written... I couldn't stop reading!"
-Phil Hellmuth

So Jesse mentioned the TOC bubble/$ bubble in the WSOP Circuit events....
I had a weird hand from the bubble where I laid down QQ to a pre-flop re-raise against, of all players, dave williams. i knew he was strong --- he showed AK. if i move in, i have no doubt that he calls.
folding that hand got me to the TOC, but it might have prevented me from going very deep in New Orleans.

Brandon