|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
:Old guy: I had 35 points, 12 assists, 18 rebounds,...and 12 blocks. That's a quadruple double, now those are numbers.
:Lebron with fro: You tellin them bald headed lies again pops. ahaha I love that commercial. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
[ QUOTE ]
:Old guy: I had 35 points, 12 assists, 18 rebounds,...and 12 blocks. That's a quadruple double, now those are numbers. :Lebron with fro: You tellin them bald headed lies again pops. [/ QUOTE ] :Old Lebron: That's a quadruple double right there, boy! :Lebron with fro: That don't make no sense to me. :Old Lebron: Don't be jealous boy! You ain't got like I got! :Lebron with fro: I don't know if I can put up with this no more. I don't understand the point either, but they are hilarious, and get the brand name across. I think Nike has such credibility already that their ads don't have to make sense. If this was a Converse ad with Dwyane Wade, for example, I don't think it would be as good - not because of Wade vs. Lebron, but because Converse isn't very established as a basketball brand compared with Adidas, Nike, or Reebok. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
[ QUOTE ]
I don't think it would be as good - not because of Wade vs. Lebron, but because Converse isn't very established as a basketball brand compared with Adidas, Nike, or Reebok. [/ QUOTE ] Magic Johnson and Larry Bird may disagree with you. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I don't think it would be as good - not because of Wade vs. Lebron, but because Converse isn't very established as a basketball brand compared with Adidas, Nike, or Reebok. [/ QUOTE ] Magic Johnson and Larry Bird may disagree with you. [/ QUOTE ] More importantly, so would Terry Tate |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] I don't think it would be as good - not because of Wade vs. Lebron, but because Converse isn't very established as a basketball brand compared with Adidas, Nike, or Reebok. [/ QUOTE ] Magic Johnson and Larry Bird may disagree with you. [/ QUOTE ] More importantly, so would Terry Tate [/ QUOTE ] Terry Tate is Reebok. Were Magic and Larry seriously Converse? That was a little before my time. As I've been growing up, I haven't seen any big basketball players endorsing them until Wade. What the hell happened? I do really like the ad they have with a bunch of his high school and college footage. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
Converse Weapons
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
Converse is now owned by Nike.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
I hate these commercials.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Can someone explain the new-recent Nike basketball commercial to m
[ QUOTE ]
Converse is now owned by Nike. [/ QUOTE ] I remember hearing this was in large part because Converse owned a trademark on the King James name. Anyone know if that's true? |
|
|