|
|
|
|
#1
12-25-2005, 04:57 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Standard? 33 #2
[ QUOTE ]
sngpt says its good... [/ QUOTE ] No it doesn't. You mean, 'I ran some calling ranges in SNGPT and I feel this push is solid based on my analysis.' SNGPT 'says' nothing in terms of correct/incorrect play....it just crunches #s based on an ICM equity model and opponent specific information that you plug in. It just so happens that in this scenario you can't really find any non-ridiculous calling ranges that make the push -EV.... OP, Yes, this push looks good. Yugoslav 
|
|
#2
12-25-2005, 05:00 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Standard? 33 #2
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] sngpt says its good... [/ QUOTE ] No it doesn't. You mean, 'I ran some calling ranges in SNGPT and I feel this push is solid based on my analysis.' SNGPT 'says' nothing in terms of correct/incorrect play....it just crunches #s based on an ICM equity model and opponent specific information that you plug in. It just so happens that in this scenario you can't really find any non-ridiculous calling ranges that make the push -EV.... OP, Yes, this push looks good. Yugoslav [/ QUOTE ] Dear Yugp, Merry Xmas. You are a douche. Love, Beef ps. you are gay too.
|
|
#3
12-25-2005, 05:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Standard? 33 #2
Beefy,
I <3 you too.....you're my favorite gay bashing beefster....besides SFB I guess, [img]/images/graemlins/crazy.gif[/img]. Merry [censored] Christmas!!! Yugoslav
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
