![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It would be useful to put the graphs in context by adding another graph of cumulative winnings in BB, ploted after each 100 hand block.
Like this? ("Linjär" = Linear; trend line) ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Like this? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, exactly what I meant... and what I expected it to look like [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Have you given consideration to any further analysis to help evaluate the short term variations? For example... how about an overlay of the 1st original chart (the 10K), with expected vs actual results based on your card distribution? |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
For example... how about an overlay of the 1st original chart (the 10K), with expected vs actual results based on your card distribution?
That's a very interesting thought. Pokerroom has extensive EV data for starting hands on their site which could be used for this. A bit more complicated to generate (edit: the data for) these graphs though, but I'll look into it. Adde |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Adde...
You could do the quick math, using your own BB/Hand calcs from PT [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
You could do the quick math, using your own BB/Hand calcs from PT [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think that might start to get a bit circular, as the two types of data (per hand win-rates and per 10,000 hand win-rates) are far from independent. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You could do the quick math, using your own BB/Hand calcs from PT [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think that might start to get a bit circular, as the two types of data (per hand win-rates and per 10,000 hand win-rates) are far from independent. [/ QUOTE ] ...now that is an understatement. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You could do the quick math, using your own BB/Hand calcs from PT [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] [/ QUOTE ] I think that might start to get a bit circular, as the two types of data (per hand win-rates and per 10,000 hand win-rates) are far from independent. [/ QUOTE ] I figured Adde would understand what I meant... If you take the Avg BB/Hand for each type of hand dealt (AA, KK, etc)... and apply it to the actual distribution of cards in each 1K segment... it will help identify when your win rate diverges from your expected win rate based on card distribution... You could then do a deeper analysis of the times when actual diverges from expected based on the cards, to help identify true leaks [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] Does that make more sense? |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
great info, thanks
|
![]() |
|
|