#1
|
|||
|
|||
999 vs LAG
5 handed, villain is 74/24/1.5 and opens in the cutoff, folds to me in the BB with red nines and I make it three, villain caps and I call.
flop [8.5sb] 9[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] I bet, he calls turn [5bb] 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] I bet, he raises, I 3bet, he caps river [13bb] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] so what's the plan now kids |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
bet/call?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
check call
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
i think check/call.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
Check-call.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
blah, thought board paired on river. Dunno what I do. Probably check/call but I think that is wrong.
True |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
I like the bet/call a lot more than check/call.
For the bet/call, if villain raises every time he has a straight, we lose 2 BB. On the other hand, we win 1 BB if he doesn't have it. I'm arbitrarily setting villain folding 10% of the time. I'm not taking into account getting raised by a lesser hand for simplicity. Also I'm assuming villain will raise with a straight, which makes sense. Let p be the probability of villain holding a straight. p * (-2BB) + (0.9-p) * (+1BB) + 0.1 * (+0BB) > 0 -2p + 0.9 - 0.9p > 0 0.9 - 2.9p > 0 1 > 2.9p p > 0.345 Villain needs to have a straight more than 34.5% of the time to make a bet unprofitable. I believe villain will have a straight less than 34.5% of the time, so I bet/call based on the EV calculations. --- For the check/call, villain is a lag. Does this mean he will bet anything when checked to? I'll set the probabilty of villain betting a lesser hand to 25%, meaning 75% of the time he'll bet when we're beat. I'm unsure on these values I used here, some input would be great. 0.25 * (+1BB) + 0.75 * (-1BB) = -0.5BB That was easy. Check/calling is -EV if villain is value betting over half the time with a hand that beats us. This seems to go against the norm of check/call replies, I'll be double checking this. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
[ QUOTE ]
I like the bet/call a lot more than check/call. For the bet/call, if villain raises every time he has a straight, we lose 2 BB. On the other hand, we win 1 BB if he doesn't have it. I'm arbitrarily setting villain folding 10% of the time. I'm not taking into account getting raised by a lesser hand for simplicity. Also I'm assuming villain will raise with a straight, which makes sense. Let p be the probability of villain holding a straight. p * (-2BB) + (0.9-p) * (+1BB) + 0.1 * (+0BB) > 0 -2p + 0.9 - 0.9p > 0 0.9 - 2.9p > 0 1 > 2.9p p > 0.345 Villain needs to have a straight more than 34.5% of the time to make a bet unprofitable. I believe villain will have a straight less than 34.5% of the time, so I bet/call based on the EV calculations. --- For the check/call, villain is a lag. Does this mean he will bet anything when checked to? I'll set the probabilty of villain betting a lesser hand to 25%, meaning 75% of the time he'll bet when we're beat. I'm unsure on these values I used here, some input would be great. 0.25 * (+1BB) + 0.75 * (-1BB) = -0.5BB That was easy. Check/calling is -EV if villain is value betting over half the time with a hand that beats us. This seems to go against the norm of check/call replies, I'll be double checking this. [/ QUOTE ] When we win with check/call we win the whole pot, not just some part of a BB. True |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
I'm evaluating the EV of the river play.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 999 vs LAG
Yes but that doesn't matter. You have to take in account what you win when you win and what you lose when you lose.
|
|
|