|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q9s
[ QUOTE ]
I'd say it gets bet way, way more often than it gets checked [/ QUOTE ] say he bets it 75% of the time and checks 25% of the time. let's say in the end the flop gets checked through 10-15% of the time (whenever CO doesn't bet after MP checks). to me it seems that this is really bad. edit: not to mention when he does lead, it's obviously with the better part of his range, meaning we are more likely to be protecting our made hand against a better made hand. the check raise doesn't seem too viable an option because of this and because i really hate seeing it get checked through, so i default to betting out with my mondo equity. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Q9s
Yeah it sucks to get this checked through. But honestly, this flop is getting bet like 95%+ of the time. We're first to act, and there is a reasonable chance that one of the guys before PFR donks this flop, a substantial chance that PFR bets if checked to, and a substantial chance that the guy behind him bets if checked to. I wouldn't be so worried about this checking through -- the issue for me is whether or not checking gives us a chance to protect or whether it consigns us to only getting one bet in on the flop when leading might have gotten two in.
|
|
|