#1
|
|||
|
|||
33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
Around halfway done with this level, blinds will increase in 4 hands or so:
***** Hand History for Game 3235624905 ***** princessa83 finished in sixth place. 100/200 Tourney Texas Hold'em Game Table (NL) (Tournament 18458551) - Tue Dec 20 21:29:21 EST 2005 Table Table 66794 (Real Money) -- Seat 4 is the button Total number of players : 5 Seat 1: Hero (1115) Seat 4: Villan(640) Seat 7: P1 (2920) Seat 8: P2 (2330) Seat 9: P3 (995) P1 posts small blind (50) P2 posts big blind (100) ** Dealing down cards ** Dealt to Hero [ Qh, Ah ] P3 folds. Hero raises (300) to 300 Villanraises (640) to 640 Villanis all-In. P1 folds. P2 folds. Hero?? I don't think this is a fold preflop, but need to check my sanity |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
Yes, that's a call. But why does it say 100/200 in the heading?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
[ QUOTE ]
Yes, that's a call. But why does it say 100/200 in the heading? [/ QUOTE ] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
Yes, you're priced into calling.
But why are you raising 3xBB preflop with only 11BB? Might as well push since you are going to be calling anyone coming over the top of you. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
When Party's levels are 50/100 blinds, they read "100/200" in the heading.
Don't ask why. Edit: P.S. easy call |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
i may be going out on a limb here, but i'm guessing that you lost the hand. in poker its important to not be result oriented, whether you won or lost the hand is irrelevant, as you want to make the correct play.
p.s. easy call |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
[ QUOTE ]
When Party's levels are 50/100 blinds, they read "100/200" in the heading. Don't ask why. [/ QUOTE ] its because when they programmed it 50/100 blinds meant 100/200 limit for limit hold'em, and they never changed it for the no limit tables. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
Thanks for the responses, I did end up losing a race against a small pair, but wanted to check the play (which I felt was correct). The reason I didn't push PF was due to the texture of the table , I felt that a raise of 3xbb would take the blinds or isolate against the small stack which I didnt' mind getting involved with HU with that hand. I also noticed the 100/200 at the top, I'm having trouble with the hand converter so just did some find-replace action with the player names. Sorry if that led to any confusion.
Thanks again! |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
The issue with the blinds is a known one and its certainly not your fault. If you can find a working converter they often take care of it.
BTW, I am 99% sure this is an unexploitable Pre-flop push. Not pushing (and other aces probably down to AT and pairs to 77) is a leak. Somebody can run the numbers if they want (i don't have SNGPT on my laptop but I would be surprised if I were wrong. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 33 PP: AQs vs Short Stack
I don't have the software either, but would like to hear the #'s. Trying to fix leaks in my game and if this is one of them I certainly want to try to avoid it. Would the fact that the two blinds are the two chip leaders have any influence on my decision to push?
Also would you give more respect to an early position push or 3x-5xbb raise? Since it's not an obvious stealing postion and all...thanks! |
|
|