#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
Do you say colbert or colbert? [/ QUOTE ] I had a prof. in college who went by Colbert (like Burt) but then this guy comes along and goes with the Colbert (like Bear). Strangely enough my prof. used to call reports (reports...as in "repore"). Frankly I'm just glad CC finally got a funny show with a political taste to it. They've been needing one for about 2 years now. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
I have the 3rd nuts? [/ QUOTE ] Whoops. Spoke too soon. Forgot about the boats.... hehe. [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img] |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
if the CO hadn't called i would have 3 bet. i figured since he checkraised two players that he had the goods. but maybe im just weak tight and that's why my poker career is one long downswing
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
You have the 3rd nuts here and he has the nuts. [/ QUOTE ] Your board reading skills suck. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] You have the 3rd nuts here and he has the nuts. [/ QUOTE ] Your board reading skills suck. [/ QUOTE ] Whoa...cool it man. I said I forgot about the boats. Sheesh! |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
Would have been even funnier if CO had 58. [/ QUOTE ] Why? Then he would have turned an OESD instead of a gutshot. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Do you say colbert or colbert? [/ QUOTE ] I had a prof. in college who went by Colbert (like Burt) but then this guy comes along and goes with the Colbert (like Bear). [/ QUOTE ] IT'S FRENCH, BITCH |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I HATE POKER GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY GAY
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] You have the 3rd nuts here and he has the nuts. [/ QUOTE ] Your board reading skills suck. [/ QUOTE ] Whoa...cool it man. I said I forgot about the boats. Sheesh! [/ QUOTE ] Wouldn't the forums be a lot clearer of this clutter if we implemented my rule of not allowing people to post until they had a post count of at least 100? I think so. It would give new posters an appropriate amount of time to learn the ropes before the condition was satisfied wherein they are allowed to post. Just my two cents, nothing against you or your mistaken comment. |
|
|