Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-19-2005, 09:42 PM
toss toss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: 2+2 Archives Digging up Gold
Posts: 1,327
Default Re: The Protected Pot Effect: A Study from 2/4

Its true MP coldcalling the river raise makes it less likely we're winning the pot, but at Party 2/4 I'll call expecting to win my fair share. At higher levels people tend to showdown less and fold when they're beat. They give up their hopeless holdings on the flop or turn. Here I'll fold. If I'm at a Party 2/4 table and notice that people are playing better than average I'll fold. If you felt the table was playing this way then I can agree with folding.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-19-2005, 09:52 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Protected Pot Effect: A Study from 2/4

The "bad" read you gave MP leads me think he's quite capable of hanging around with a weaker PP and gives me less reason to put stock in the "protected pot". Without that read, it's a different story.

I think YHIG more than often enough to make this call.

My gut says you're splitting this pot though.

Good post.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-19-2005, 09:54 PM
private joker private joker is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,943
Default Re: The Protected Pot Effect: A Study from 2/4

[ QUOTE ]


My gut says you're splitting this pot though.


[/ QUOTE ]

You're putting one of the opponents on exactly KJ? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The Protected Pot Effect: A Study from 2/4

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]


My gut says you're splitting this pot though.


[/ QUOTE ]

You're putting one of the opponents on exactly KJ? [img]/images/graemlins/confused.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

That would be a requirement for splitting.
Damn my gut is a smartass [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2005, 10:10 PM
rt1 rt1 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: irc
Posts: 33
Default Re: The Protected Pot Effect: A Study from 2/4

17:1 and closing the action... you call. no doubt about it.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.