|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake
[ QUOTE ]
the $1 per hand rake seems reasonable. for comparison, at foxwoods the rake on the 2/4 game is 10% up to $4 max. [/ QUOTE ] I seem to remember this coming up before, and I think that the $1 hand fee for this particular casino means "$1 every time you want cards dealt to you" not "$1 per pot". Basically, it's horrible. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] the $1 per hand rake seems reasonable. for comparison, at foxwoods the rake on the 2/4 game is 10% up to $4 max. [/ QUOTE ] I seem to remember this coming up before, and I think that the $1 hand fee for this particular casino means "$1 every time you want cards dealt to you" not "$1 per pot". Basically, it's horrible. [/ QUOTE ] So it's more like, "That'll be a dollar for that 7-2 I just dealt you. Thank you, sir." If so, it's beyond horrible. |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake
[ QUOTE ]
So it's more like, "That'll be a dollar for that 7-2 I just dealt you. Thank you, sir." If so, it's beyond horrible. [/ QUOTE ] If it's the same place that was posted about before it's, "That'll be $1 if you want to be dealt into this hand at all." |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] So it's more like, "That'll be a dollar for that 7-2 I just dealt you. Thank you, sir." If so, it's beyond horrible. [/ QUOTE ] If it's the same place that was posted about before it's, "That'll be $1 if you want to be dealt into this hand at all." [/ QUOTE ] I played at Bellagio this past weekend with an Aussie guy, and he told me that's how it is in Australia. Pretty draconian, and probably an unbeatable structure. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Rake
You are correct. It's $1/hand/player.
There was some joint in the midwest doing that plus $3 or $4 max rake on the game. Why anyone would play is beyond me. |
|
|