|
|
|
|
#1
12-16-2005, 09:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
Doyle has 700 million dollars? I wonder if he's good at poker or if he's just running good.... [/ QUOTE ] Doyle's sample size is too small. He has only been playing for like 50+ years. In order to be statistically correct he would have to play for 178 years, 7 months, 13 days, 4 hours, and seven minutes. It's too early to tell if Doyle is truely a winning player in the long run. He truely might just be a bad player on a winning streak. 
|
|
#2
12-16-2005, 09:38 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Follow up to Doyles bid for the wpt
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Doyle has 700 million dollars? I wonder if he's good at poker or if he's just running good.... [/ QUOTE ] Doyle's sample size is too small. He has only been playing for like 50+ years. In order to be statistically correct he would have to play for 178 years, 7 months, 13 days, 4 hours, and seven minutes. It's too early to tell if Doyle is truely a winning player in the long run. He truely might just be a bad player on a winning streak. [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, especially since he primarily plays B&M and we all know that you only get about 35 hands an hour there. I think Gigabet may be the world's only proven winner since he's been 8 tabling for years. [img]/images/graemlins/smirk.gif[/img]
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
