Hand from Bellagio 5 diamond

[Gigabet]

[ QUOTE ]
I'd be thinking she has the K, or a high pair and is convinced you dont

[/ QUOTE ]

I also thought that she had a K, or at the very worst JJ, but I really trusted my read that she would fold all one pair hands, and possibly even A6(which, given the preflop action is a virtual impossible holding for her.) I had been in several hands where the action made it to the river, and I had made large bets on that street, and always showed the nuts, or near nuts. Remember, we were talking throughout the night about hands being played out, so it was definitely recognized by her that I only made it to the river with the best hand. There was never a situation(that was shown down) where I had made a river bet, that wasn't obviously a value bet, that a one pair hand could beat.

In retrospect, I wish I had given the hand up, but I had spent alot of time setting up a big hand with her, and this really felt like it was the "spot." I felt like I needed to take advantage of it, while it was there. In any case, when I was thinking about the size of my bet on the turn, I really wanted to make a bet that tested her stack, yet, wasn't impossible to call, with the idea that my continuation bet on the river was a natural conclusion to representing the near nuts, but with overtones of a bluff. Which would be very similar to other lines I had played out in previous hands, yet showed the near nuts.

[GimmeDaWatch]

Gig, whatever conjecture may be brought up about this hand, that obviously took alot of balls, so here here. Anyway, what were your thoughts about the tiny underbet on the flop? This would be a really strange bet from my perspective w/QQ-TT/AQ-AJ as she wouldnt want to induce a call or show too much weakness. I suppose she could figure you to be drawing nearly dead as well if she had AA/AK but still, it looks a little fishy. Kind of reminds me of the "please play back at me" thing David Williams pulled in the WSOP final table against Matt Dean. I remember watching the hand play out live on Stars, and thinking his small re-raise from the blind was bizarre in that it would never get anyone to fold, and then he bets tiny on the flop and induces Dean to move in w/AT against his AA. The two hands are obviously not the same, just curious if you had any thoughts on it at the time.