|
|
|
|
#1
12-15-2005, 10:03 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
Still one of the best things I've read on here.
|
|
#2
12-14-2005, 11:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
[ QUOTE ]
$100NL 6max is tighter and finding good games can be tough [/ QUOTE ] eh i play alot during off peak times being from the uk and i can always find plenty of good games. [ QUOTE ] Another huge factor is that the 100NL players don't seem to pay you off nearly as much on your big hands. [/ QUOTE ] again eh. 100nl 6maxers are huge payoff machines. they simply refuse to ever believe u have a hand. i get looked up with the most rediculous holdings all the time. to op if you have the bankroll move up. 2 table for a little bit to get used to the increased aggression and you will be fine. paul
|
|
#3
12-14-2005, 01:34 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
the quality of play goes up, but not tremendously. Play is a little tighter and more aggressive, the good players are a little better, there aren't as many bad players, the bad players are still just as bad. Since this is the first limit you can realistically make a living wage at, you will occasionally run into a player that isn't just good, but very good.
|
|
#4
12-14-2005, 01:45 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
[ QUOTE ]
Since this is the first limit you can realistically make a living wage at, you will occasionally run into a player that isn't just good, but very good. [/ QUOTE ] The current living wage estimation nation wide is $14 an hour [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]. Yeah Labor History 100
|
|
#5
12-14-2005, 01:59 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
[ QUOTE ]
The current living wage estimation nation wide is $14 an hour [/ QUOTE ] assuming you're working 40 hrs a week, which poker players dont [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]. Not a point i want to argue about, i just think noone is playing poker professionally at the 50NL level, while there are a few out there at 100NL.
|
|
#6
12-14-2005, 02:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
Since when did he say anything about playing professional?
|
|
#7
12-14-2005, 03:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
he didn't, i did. I said one of the differences between 100NL and 50NL is that at the higher stakes you'll every once in a while run into a player who is very good, this may be because playing professionally at 100NL is possible while at 50NL it probably isn't.
|
|
#8
12-14-2005, 10:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
In terms of making the most money per week I find that NL 50 is far easier than NL25 and NL200 is far easier than NL100. Aside from obvious reasoning, this is because people are looser at NL200 and NL50. NL 50 is comparable to NL100 IMO just with bigger stacks.
|
|
#9
12-14-2005, 10:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
[ QUOTE ]
In terms of making the most money per week I find that NL 50 is far easier than NL25 and NL200 is far easier than NL100. Aside from obvious reasoning, this is because people are looser at NL200 and NL50. NL 50 is comparable to NL100 IMO just with bigger stacks. [/ QUOTE ] this is pretty much true. putting money in your bankroll if youre a winning player is one of the best investments you can possibly make.
|
|
#10
12-14-2005, 10:16 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 100 NL 6max vs. 50 NL 6max
In terms of making the most money per week I find that NL 50 is far easier than NL25 and NL200 is far easier than NL100. Aside from obvious reasoning, this is because people are looser at NL200 and NL50. NL 50 is comparable to NL100 IMO just with bigger stacks.
So you are actually saying that you think $200NL is easier than $50NL?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
