|
View Poll Results: Will GWB be an Anchor? | |||
Yes | 24 | 58.54% | |
No | 17 | 41.46% | |
Voters: 41. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
Damn you must be nuts to cap when there's only been one raise.
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
One more thing:
Pokerstove is still chugging away, but when you add in a third person limping with a wide range (40% minus premiums), equity looks like it drops to about 34% preflop. I suppose with position and dead blind money this equates to a slight edge. This plus the near unanymous vote to 3-bet makes me reconsider folding here. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
Given the opponent description, this is a real easy BEEEP! :We interrupt this response to say the answer is somewhere in the beginner/small stakes forum. Now back to your regularly scheduled response.: and I'm sure the voting will reflect that.
b |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
We are essentially just debating a read here right? Jason thinks he is a tight/passive PF player with relatively static raising standards.
You belive he is capable of making adjustments based on position and table texture. I guess the real thing to be debating is where the information for your read came from...ie what have you observed? Because the statisical information seems to favor Jason's read. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
Because the statisical information seems to favor Jason's read. [/ QUOTE ] Where did you get the impression that a 13/8 is unduly tight with his PFR standards after a limper? |
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
The more poker you play the more you should realise that AQo is virtually never fit to cold-call with.
Only on extremely rare occasions and under perfect conditions would I even consider an isolation 3-bet with it and even then it's marginal at best. If ANY limper and ANY raiser are already in front, forget it, even if one's a fish and the other a donkey. The hand is weak, vulnerable and you're paying too much to even try. You do have a positional advantage, however. You get to see what's going on in front of you and that is precisely what enables you to MUCK IT without getting involved ass-backwards to begin with! This opinion, of course, will get me branded as a weak-tight nit. But I don't care. Do yourself a favor. Muck first and ask questions later. |
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
Given our position and the action thus far, this hand is far to big not to 3bet.
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
My guess is there's at least a 3% margin of error in a sample as small as 2300 hands. Just a guess, based on how I've seen myself portrayed over 1k, 2k, and 5k hand samples. Rob [/ QUOTE ] A 95% confidence interval is plus or minus 1.3%, assuming his true PFR is .12 |
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
no love for the coldcall? [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
3-bizzle! |
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: I\'m turning jason into a LAG. The AQo test?
[ QUOTE ]
Only on extremely rare occasions and under perfect conditions would I even consider an isolation 3-bet with it and even then it's marginal at best. If ANY limper and ANY raiser are already in front, forget it, even if one's a fish and the other a donkey [/ QUOTE ] It doesn't take perfect conditions at all. Auto-folding this, especially if it's a loose raiser in front of a loose limper is losing money. Especially if you can fold everyone else out behind you with a 3 bet with position. I'd suggest practicing postflop play with this hand if you're really that worried about it against weak players. [ QUOTE ] The hand is weak, vulnerable and you're paying too much to even try. [/ QUOTE ] In many cases, you may also have the best hand. b |
|
|