#31
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
bump
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
BIMP
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
bump [/ QUOTE ] LOL |
#34
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
I honestly don't understand why his opinion doesn't matter.
Being a moderator is not being the owner. If Mason came and said what you said I would totally agree. |
#35
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
Being a moderator is not being the owner. If Mason came and said what you said I would totally agree. [/ QUOTE ] Look up "agent" in a business law dictionary |
#36
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
Tony,
I would be willing to wager a rather large amount I know more about business law than you. |
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
Tony, I would be willing to wager a rather large amount I know more about anything than you. [/ QUOTE ] except entry level retail jobs |
#38
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
Brujita,
If you're willing to make that wager then I'm sure you do. Relax. Tony |
#39
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
E-fight!
What's the line? |
#40
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Are *\'s taking it too far?
[ QUOTE ]
E-fight! What's the line? [/ QUOTE ] I put the over/under of this thread at 2 *'s |
|
|