![]() |
|
View Poll Results: The Raveonettes are... | |||
Good |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 9.46% |
Great |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
5 | 6.76% |
Terrible |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 8.11% |
Who are the Raveonettes? |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
56 | 75.68% |
Voters: 74. You may not vote on this poll |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I limp. I'd raise TT+
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
I limp. I'd raise TT+ [/ QUOTE ] |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] I limp. I'd raise TT+ [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] FWIW, this is my standard line... and I get good results with it. Just wondering though, it is tempting to mix it up and raise this hand here. I agree limping and folding when you miss is better. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I like a blended strategy - maybe limp/raise something like 60/40 or 70/30.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Would you rather see a Qxx flop with one raise caller, or with three other limpers? The reason why I raise is to get all those KJ-KQ-QJ-QT-KT-JT assheads out of there. Ax is gonna call. Why would you want to play a pair against ALL of the range of overcards from ace to ten (which you likely are doing with 3+ callers)? I don't hate a flop of one overcard with position as long as it's a non-ace and I only have one other opponent.
|
![]() |
|
|