|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reverse domination in deep games
The 4 gappers haven't worked out well for me. But I def call with 97o. Then again, this is a game where average stack is 400xbb.
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reverse domination in deep games
[ QUOTE ]
The 4 gappers haven't worked out well for me. But I def call with 97o. Then again, this is a game where average stack is 400xbb. [/ QUOTE ] I love those games - it's like playing PLO except with two cards.... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reverse domination in deep games
It's really funny, because 97o was my first example. Then I edited it to be a little weaker. :-)
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Reverse domination in deep games
Think about this though... if you only played aces with better kickers you could get two pair over two pair!
|
|
|