![]() |
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
They would have to be rake free b/c it's disgusting what the rake does. [/ QUOTE ] is the concern the actual $ cost of the match or the amount of play it takes out of the match? what do you think it would end up costing playing .25-.50? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
hes not worried about the cost, hes worried about them taking chips off the table and screwing up the tourney
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
hes not worried about the cost, hes worried about them taking chips off the table and screwing up the tourney [/ QUOTE ] if this is the only problem we could just have the match use 320bb instead of 300 right? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] hes not worried about the cost, hes worried about them taking chips off the table and screwing up the tourney [/ QUOTE ] if this is the only problem we could just have the match use 320bb instead of 300 right? [/ QUOTE ] Well really the rake depends on how long the match takes which is impossible to predict. I think the UB play money tables will be satisfactory. What do other people think? Should other structures be allowed? |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Not that it would be a big deal, but rake could affect different styles differently to the point where it would give a certain style a minute advantage.
It's just so much easier keeping track and what not when there is no rake. |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] They would have to be rake free b/c it's disgusting what the rake does. [/ QUOTE ] is the concern the actual $ cost of the match or the amount of play it takes out of the match? what do you think it would end up costing playing .25-.50? [/ QUOTE ] maybe $10 tops, but that is 20bbs, which is significant. |
![]() |
|
|