|
|
|
|
#1
12-09-2005, 08:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
Unfortunatly this thread seems to violate the banned content rule in the sticky, with regards to piracy. That sucks because I think this has potential.
|
|
#2
12-09-2005, 09:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[ QUOTE ]
Unfortunatly this thread seems to violate the banned content rule in the sticky, with regards to piracy. That sucks because I think this has potential. [/ QUOTE ] Ah, [censored], I missed it. You think it will get taken down? |
|
#3
12-09-2005, 09:25 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[censored] that, I can show the legal precedent that supports this thread, google the 1995 AHRA which allows for sharing of intellectual property if the person sharing owns it and isnt profiting.
share away. |
|
#4
12-09-2005, 10:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[ QUOTE ]
[censored] that, I can show the legal precedent that supports this thread, google the 1995 AHRA which allows for sharing of intellectual property if the person sharing owns it and isnt profiting. share away. [/ QUOTE ] You do realize that by "person who owns the IP", they mean "the artist or label"? Simply owning a copy of the CD does not give you the right to copy it and pass it out. This is exactly what the RIAA extorts those 5k-10k "settlements" for. |
|
#5
12-09-2005, 10:16 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [censored] that, I can show the legal precedent that supports this thread, google the 1995 AHRA which allows for sharing of intellectual property if the person sharing owns it and isnt profiting. share away. [/ QUOTE ] You do realize that by "person who owns the IP", they mean "the artist or label"? Simply owning a copy of the CD does not give you the right to copy it and pass it out. This is exactly what the RIAA extorts those 5k-10k "settlements" for. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, I do, but its the only possible defense there is. |
|
#6
12-09-2005, 10:20 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [censored] that, I can show the legal precedent that supports this thread, google the 1995 AHRA which allows for sharing of intellectual property if the person sharing owns it and isnt profiting. share away. [/ QUOTE ] You do realize that by "person who owns the IP", they mean "the artist or label"? Simply owning a copy of the CD does not give you the right to copy it and pass it out. This is exactly what the RIAA extorts those 5k-10k "settlements" for. [/ QUOTE ] yeah, I do, but its the only possible defense there is. [/ QUOTE ] The RIAA wouldn't need their overpaid team of lawyers to [censored] us all on that one... a chimp in a suit would be all they'd need to have us all paying out the ass. The only real defense will be [censored] locking this thread down, deleting the links, and [censored] the [censored] hell out of the OP. And by "[censored] the [censored] hell out of the OP", I mean "giving the OP ***". |
|
#7
12-09-2005, 09:46 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Share some songs no one else has heard
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Unfortunatly this thread seems to violate the banned content rule in the sticky, with regards to piracy. That sucks because I think this has potential. [/ QUOTE ] Ah, [censored], I missed it. You think it will get taken down? [/ QUOTE ] I pm'ed astro, but he is not online. In fact, no one is online, so you should just take advantage of that fact. I don't think this will be a problem with the OOT moderators or Mat Sklansky anyways. We have done threads like this recently and nothing was done about it. I don't think the rule astro posted about this is a new policy, just a restating of the existing policy. We'll see. |
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
