Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > 2+2 Communities > Other Other Topics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:29 PM
JihadOnTheRiver JihadOnTheRiver is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Chillin with Borat. I LIKE!
Posts: 220
Default The rating system

The way people on this site rate women is pretty close to retarded. Either people are entirely too picky (those people strike me as fat, pasty computer nerds that haven't gotten puss in months), or they are entirely too liberal. You will see a lot of comments like "OMFG she's totally hot I would eat the corn..." and in the same thread "Holy crap you guys are so desperate she's only a 3; great boobs, nice ass, pretty face, but her ankles are too big."

My friends and I have solved this problem. We have what we think to be a univerally appropriate 1-10 rating system. In many blind tests of the system, when shown the same girl, her point spread is no more than .5 between 5 or so people.

The key to the system is understanding that God made pretty people, and God made ugly people. You must create an appropriate image in your head of the AVERAGE GIRL. The rating system is the classic Bell Curve type.

That is to say, it is an exceptionally good day if you saw a girl that was >8, but you had a traumatic experience if you saw a <2. An 8 would be what most people would refer to as universally attractive. A 9 could potentially stop your heart. A 10 is perfect in every possible way, therefor, DOES NOT EXIST , nor does a 0. A 1-2 would probably be akin to what would happen if Janet Reno started doing crack, stopped showering, and got menopause-acne. Understand, a 2 should be rightly equivalent to an 8, "remarkably off the average".

Once you understand that the VAST majority of women are 4-6 (average), you stop hearing people saying "OMFG I SAW THIS CHICK TODAY SHE WAS A STRAIGHT 10 EASY!" My friends and I utilize the .5, and sometimes go into more definition (i.e. 6.8). But the important part is that when one of us says "I met a 7.5 today," we're all on the same page.

I feel it would do OOT a lot of good to reign in the outlandish ratings that currently are given out here.

Thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:39 PM
Dominic Dominic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 611
Default Re: The rating system

[ QUOTE ]
The way people on this site rate women is pretty close to retarded. Either people are entirely too picky (those people strike me as fat, pasty computer nerds that haven't gotten puss in months), or they are entirely too liberal. You will see a lot of comments like "OMFG she's totally hot I would eat the corn..." and in the same thread "Holy crap you guys are so desperate she's only a 3; great boobs, nice ass, pretty face, but her ankles are too big."

My friends and I have solved this problem. We have what we think to be a univerally appropriate 1-10 rating system. In many blind tests of the system, when shown the same girl, her point spread is no more than .5 between 5 or so people.

The key to the system is understanding that God made pretty people, and God made ugly people. You must create an appropriate image in your head of the AVERAGE GIRL. The rating system is the classic Bell Curve type.

That is to say, it is an exceptionally good day if you saw a girl that was >8, but you had a traumatic experience if you saw a <2. An 8 would be what most people would refer to as universally attractive. A 9 could potentially stop your heart. A 10 is perfect in every possible way, therefor, DOES NOT EXIST , nor does a 0. A 1-2 would probably be akin to what would happen if Janet Reno started doing crack, stopped showering, and got menopause-acne. Understand, a 2 should be rightly equivalent to an 8, "remarkably off the average".

Once you understand that the VAST majority of women are 4-6 (average), you stop hearing people saying "OMFG I SAW THIS CHICK TODAY SHE WAS A STRAIGHT 10 EASY!" My friends and I utilize the .5, and sometimes go into more definition (i.e. 6.8). But the important part is that when one of us says "I met a 7.5 today," we're all on the same page.

I feel it would do OOT a lot of good to reign in the outlandish ratings that currently are given out here.

Thoughts?

[/ QUOTE ]

Yeah, I have a thought. Why spend all this effort on rating women you're probably too scared to go up and talk to?

This is just wasted energy, Man. Who cares if you saw a 7.5 or an 8? Did you meet her? Get her number? That's what's important. This rating of women like it's some amazingly complex system is for morans.

And I say this in a "I'm just gonna be a dik this one time" voice. So don't take me seriously. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:39 PM
MrWookie47 MrWookie47 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: ^^ That wookie
Posts: 1,485
Default Re: The rating system

Eh, I think that's a lot of what people claim their rating system is. Unfortunately, all you have to do is stroll around any given Wal-Mart for a half hour, and that'll really force you to readjust your definition of what "average" really is. THAT's the thing that's really throwing off the ratings, methinks.

I also think that the three point system (hit it, hit it drunk, won't hit it) has plenty of merit.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:41 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: The rating system

1 - wouldn't do her
2 - do her after some shots
3 - I'd hit it
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:43 PM
JordanIB JordanIB is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 134
Default Re: The rating system

I'm shocked this was not the first response:

This thread is useless without pics!!!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:47 PM
TheMainEvent TheMainEvent is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 544
Default Re: The rating system

[ QUOTE ]
I'm shocked this was not the first response:

This thread is useless without pics!!!

[/ QUOTE ]

seconded. If he had a pic to demonstrate each number on the scale it would actually be a great thread.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The rating system

[ QUOTE ]
1 - wouldn't do her
2 - do her after some shots
3 - I'd hit it

[/ QUOTE ]

Revised to:

1 - wouldnt hit it
2 - would hit it when intoxicated
3 - would hit it, but wouldnt tell anyone
4 - would definitely hit it
5 - would hold her hand in public
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: The rating system

There are many factors other than a girl's looks that can contribute to how you rate them. for example: how long it's been since you last got some, quality of photograph, and what she happens to be wearing in the photo. There is a lot of room for variance. I'm not surprised at all that there are many weird rankings on this site.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:52 PM
kyro kyro is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Rochester, NH
Posts: 400
Default Re: The rating system

2 and 3 are really the same thing.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-08-2005, 04:52 PM
codewarrior codewarrior is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Mentor, OH, USA
Posts: 79
Default Re: The rating system

Rating women is pretty close to retarded.

Good day.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:11 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.