|
|
|
|
#1
12-07-2005, 04:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 200/400 bellagio AQo
I'm with SKP here post flop, but disagree on the pre-flop part. If our OOP slowplaying tricky villain knows that BK is capable of re-raising to isolate, then I can definitely see a wider range of hands he could hold off hoping to isolate BK with. This is not to say he would do so with a crap range of hands, but definitely something legitimate like some pocket pair, Ax, or even Kx could be in his holdings.
Thus I like BK's cap for value. If I am able to get it HU on the turn with our villain, I probably will also smooth call and raise the river. Lawrence 
|
|
#2
12-08-2005, 09:03 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200/400 bellagio AQo
But Lawrence....
...Famous starting words of Jim Brier posts where he disagreed with someone... But Lawrence, on this preflop play, the John Feeney AQ test [which is of course renamed the KJ test in Southern California] says that we should fold AQ to an early position raise. Here, we have the sb - we can't get a more early position - not just raising but 3 betting. Surely, taking the lessons learned from the AQ test, we should be proceeding with some caution. Granted, there may be reasons to 4 bet but those reasons I suggest wouldn't include 'for value'.
|
|
#3
12-08-2005, 11:11 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: 200/400 bellagio AQo
[ QUOTE ]
Granted, there may be reasons to 4 bet but those reasons I suggest wouldn't include 'for value'. [/ QUOTE ] Such as not being able to put me on AA-KK-AK when I 4-bet? Of course, the alternative here is "never 4-bet." I'm not a good enough player to know which is better.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
