#1
|
|||
|
|||
Genius losers?
Sometimes I read posts here that explains probability and simulations are run and all this fancy stuff that shows how a certain hand is + or - EV. I am very impressed even though I don't understand any of it (and I did take advanced calculus in 3rd year EE at U Waterloo). Am I right in assuming that if u know all that math and are able to apply it like that, you must big a big winner? Obviuosly, just bc u are good at math doesn't mean u will be a winner at poker, but I figure that if you are that good in applying math to poker and you are a regular on 2+2, you must study poker as well and therefore are a longterm big winner.
Is there anyone here willing to admit that they are losers at poker but can understand all that math mumbo-jumbo that is often displayed here? |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
The advanced mathematics has almost no relevance to a winning poker player, however the ability to understand such difficult levels of logic in advanced mathematics helps in poker in a relative sense, because poker is also a very difficult array of logic. As far as being a good poker player there isn't much more you need to know besides basic arithmetic and it's applications.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
[ QUOTE ]
Sometimes I read posts here that explains probability and simulations are run and all this fancy stuff that shows how a certain hand is + or - EV. I am very impressed even though I don't understand any of it (and I did take advanced calculus in 3rd year EE at U Waterloo). Am I right in assuming that if u know all that math and are able to apply it like that, you must big a big winner? Obviuosly, just bc u are good at math doesn't mean u will be a winner at poker, but I figure that if you are that good in applying math to poker and you are a regular on 2+2, you must study poker as well and therefore are a longterm big winner. Is there anyone here willing to admit that they are losers at poker but can understand all that math mumbo-jumbo that is often displayed here? [/ QUOTE ] Are you kidding? EV = sigma(probability * return) It ain't rocket science. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
I would have said that what really counts is discipline. Yes, the maths is useful, but it's probably the 2nd or third most important consideration.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
You took calculus but do not understand probability? Didn't you have to pass prob before taking calc?
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
Math is just a tool. If you don't use it right, you won't win. Plus, there's more to poker than just math.
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
[ QUOTE ]
fancy stuff that shows how a certain hand is + or - EV. [/ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] math mumbo-jumbo [/ QUOTE ] I havent seen math more difficult than 7th grade algebra applied to any poker problem on this forum. |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
Barry Greenstein gave a lecture at UIUC that I attended w/other 2+2ers in which he addressed this topic. He told stories about games with brilliant math professors that he destroyed in poker. I believe he attributed it to brilliant math minds not seeing the big picture.
He told a story about raising pot on the river against a player he knew he just outdrew. The player sat there and computed the odds of Barry having the few hands that beat him and came up with some 1000/1 number and called. The thing he didn't account for was that Barry would only raise him with that hand since Barry knew what he had. I believe he addresses this in his book as well. -Craig |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
I know it was only a movie but wasn't the math genius in the "Cincinatti Kid" a big loser? Even though it was only a movie I thoght it was a good depiction/example that you need more than math skills to be good at Poker.
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Genius losers?
[ QUOTE ]
I know it was only a movie but wasn't the math genius in the "Cincinatti Kid" a big loser? Even though it was only a movie I thoght it was a good depiction/example that you need more than math skills to be good at Poker. [/ QUOTE ] xactly! weasely looking guy with glasses and a notebook doing calcs at the table. The hand he goes bust on he screams "You should NOT have called with that hand!" I wish I could find that clip, host it somewhere and send the link via the chatroom to any nit that shouts something similar when outdrawn. It does a nice job of showing what an idiot you look like when you do this (wait, let me replace all the "you"s in this with "I" since I do this as well). Also, being quick at simple calculations is better than taking time to get a long formula right. FishNChips |
|
|