![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Is one form "better" than the other? For example, say I want to have $44 worth of tables open, would I be better suited to 4 tabling the $11s or 2 tabling the $22s?
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Assuming you can play 4 tables equally as well as you play 2 tables, then 4 tabling the $11s is better. Lower variance and worse players.
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Since it is much easier to keep track of 18 other players than it is 36, I would go with less tableat higher buyins. You play much better this way, IMOO
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Assuming you can play 4 tables equally as well as you play 2 tables, then 4 tabling the $11s is better. Lower variance and worse players. [/ QUOTE ] i'm not really sure how it makes sense the other way around. unless maybe you're talking about the difference between $5s and $11s, since the players are equally donky-donk. |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
Less tables.
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
The 11s really aren't all that read-dependent. Playing really basically without doing anything fancy will get you a positive ROI. If you can play well at 4-tables, play four.
Like Splashpot said too, more tables = less variance. |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
if your goal is to make the most $$/hr then most likely you will need to play as many tables as possible.
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
sigh.
how about you sit down and [censored] think about it for a while? citanul |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
It depends.
What's better? Higher hourly rate? Lower variance? Better chance at improving skill? Even if you were to say hourly rate, it's quite possible that someone could have a higher hourly rate 4 tabling the 11s whereas someone else would find it more profitable to 2-table the 22s. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
sigh. how about you sit down and [censored] think about it for a while? citanul [/ QUOTE ] I agree with this. Also, why is this situation always stated as an either/or proposition? I don't believe it should be. More tables and higher buyin is obviously the answer in the long run. |
![]() |
|
|