#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSYCH QUEST: 60K Tilt-Free, A-Game Hands at 10/20 6-max
I'm thinking that maybe your good sessions are less due to your "A game" than to getting a good run of cards, and your bad sessions may be less due to "tilt" than to a bad run of cards.
Those sessions where you win 3BB/100 or considerably more at 6max are quite common, as are the ones where you lose more than 3BB/100. That's just the way 6max works. Planning on 6 tabling for 3BB/100 is really, really unrealistic. You are setting yourself up to fail. Sure, I'd like to "plan" on only having winning sessions where the cards fall my way. Unfortunately, planning won't make that happen. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: PSYCH QUEST: 60K Tilt-Free, A-Game Hands at 10/20 6-max
Aw, thanks... I knew you guys had faith in me! [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Well I was thinking about replying to your guys' concerns but I realize there's not much point. I just gotta do the challenge and let the results speak for themselves. If I only win 12 or 15BB/hour instead of 18BB/hour that's pretty good even though I "failed" to reach targets.
That's why I'm calling it a target... I have as little emotion as possible attached to my 'success' or 'failure', just a realistic set of expectations that I can either meet or fail to meet. In any case, I will post my results at the end so if it turns out I only win 0.5BB/100 for the course of the challenge you can all tell me "I told you so." |
|
|