Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #2  
Old 11-23-2005, 01:52 AM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 415
Default Re: Can a number ever be small enough to be considered zero?

That depends on who makes the first move. If the casino announces fixed odds, you can choose a number of trials great enough that you are likely to win. If, on the other hand, you announce how many times you are willing to play, they can create a game with bad enough odds you are unlikely to win.

But there is no "one size fits all" number which can be names as "close enough to be considered zero." It's a case by case analysis to determine how small of a number, if any at all, is negligible for a particular type of mathematical question.

In mathematical proofs you will often see phrases like "for sufficiently large N," which is a shorthand for a particular condition -- usually something like "if you first specify the maximum size of error you will tolerate and call it delta, I can name an N beyond which you're guaranteed to always come closer than delta to the answer."
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.