#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Argument for God
Stop trying to use unclear (but correct) logic to confuse people. Its fairly obvious ~R -> ~Q is equivalent to Q -> R (MT). So you have the hypotheses P, P->Q, Q->R, and the conclusion R.
How does the existence of "absolute morality" (whatever that is) imply the existence of "God"? |
|
|