#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Betting for value or stupidity?
I am pleased with these numbers, and I agree that the situation looks pretty much just as good as against random hands. This does not say much for the opponents [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].
Anyways, whenenever I get a situation like this, I think of how strongly Ed Miller advocates raising the big suited cards in this spot (ie. vs weak hands). I guess it would be different if a rock had limped utg or something. |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Betting for value or stupidity?
[ QUOTE ]
I also like the turn bet, as you may have made MP1 fold an A with a bad kicker [/ QUOTE ] I remember the last time I saw someone at a Party .5/1 table fold a paired ace with a weak kicker...2002, I think. For the OP, betting out the turn is fine here because you might actually be ahead. But this epidemic of leading the turn with nothing but a flush draw is the scourge of our college campuses. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Betting for value or stupidity?
[ QUOTE ]
Pumping the flop is good. I don't know how much betting the turn actually does for you. [/ QUOTE ] |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Betting for value or stupidity?
seems fine imo.
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Betting for value or stupidity?
[ QUOTE ]
I don't know how much betting the turn actually does for you. I'd really hate to get raised by MP1 or MP3. [/ QUOTE ] With the chance of being ahead + outs + (slight) chance of folding a better hand (e.g. Ax, KJ) I think a turn bet is OK. Also, if someone else has a FD, the deceptive value of a bet on the turn could get you paid off big time with a river [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] (MP3 looks a likely candidate). I don't think you get raised here very often. Since hero raised PF, they have to fear AA, KK & AK given the flop action. rgb |
|
|