|
|
|
|
#1
11-18-2005, 03:35 PM
|
|||
|
|||
custos mundi
That we didn't find the WMD's doesn't matter because we couldn't take the risk that he did have them. And whoever they elect is up to them but will surely be much friendlier and less of a threat than Saddam.
|
|
#2
11-19-2005, 12:35 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Custodians
[ QUOTE ]
That we didn't find the WMD's doesn't matter because we couldn't take the risk that he did have them. [/ QUOTE ] Sklansky should start a thread about the threshold of probability of a country having WMDs, above which the United States invades! But, then of course, we should have to define very carefully what are WMDs! (And then exclude Israel from the list.) [ QUOTE ] Whoever they elect [in Iraq] is up to them but will surely be much friendlier and less of a threat than Saddam. [/ QUOTE ] I'd say those words will come back to haunt you but that would be assuming a lot from your part.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
