![]() |
#1
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
I saw it. Loved it.
Can you make your current one move, too? Irieguy |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
Can you make your current one move, too? [/ QUOTE ] Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated. Young cute chicks making out? Yeah...need some animation [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
<<<Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated.>>
If there is ever a post in need of deleting, this is it. This has to be the sacrilegious statement ever uttered/written on these boards! |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
![]() ...should have added "IMO" i guess. I like'm less than huge (and I seriously doubt that I'm the only one). ~deleteaway |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
we have to keep this thread going I am shooting for "worst post with a fire thingy next to it" (there is an award for that right?)
Straight Flushes, SAM PS you should see the link I sent citanul |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
...keep this thread going..."worst post with a fire thingy next to it" [/ QUOTE ] Can do. I caught the avatar. It was splendid. give out the link so i/we can stare hypnotically at the (hopefully) larger version. now, about: [ QUOTE ] Monstrous boobies are monstrously overrated. [/ QUOTE ] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] [img]/images/graemlins/mad.gif[/img] see, heres the thing. theres a bigger=better rule that hold only within boundarys. You have to go apples vs apples. Theres monsterous, on a "plump" woman, wheres its just droop/sag, and extra skin and all smooshy fat. thats no good. i dont like those, not much. But theres sort of "supercritical" breasts. where they retain the integrity of the nice smaller ones, but somehow manage to pull of being really big, with the girl still having, like, shes low BMI. Firm. Goot. So my thinking, you cant overrate monsterous breasts if they are BIG and NICE. its simply the superlative of any description you give. where i grant leeway is the fatty big, could be called overrated, but i mean, whos been rating those so high to begin with? Not me! Anyways, theres my mini-rant Sam, anyone wanna take this ball and run with it? BL' <--all his porn is "naturals" ![]() |
#8
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
BL' <--all his porn is "naturals" ![]() [/ QUOTE ] You're really limiting yourself here. |
#9
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
you haven't seen my stash [img]/images/graemlins/blush.gif[/img]
|
#10
|
|||
|
|||
![]()
[ QUOTE ]
see, heres the thing. theres a bigger=better rule that hold only within boundarys. You have to go apples vs apples. Theres monsterous, on a "plump" woman, wheres its just droop/sag, and extra skin and all smooshy fat. thats no good. i dont like those, not much. But theres sort of "supercritical" breasts. where they retain the integrity of the nice smaller ones, but somehow manage to pull of being really big, with the girl still having, like, shes low BMI. Firm. Goot. So my thinking, you cant overrate monsterous breasts if they are BIG and NICE. its simply the superlative of any description you give. where i grant leeway is the fatty big, could be called overrated, but i mean, whos been rating those so high to begin with? Not me! [/ QUOTE ] I see we have a connoisseur NH sir Straight Flushes, SAM PS looking for the link. |
![]() |
|
|